Whose better?
2007-07-30 16:18:13 · 13 answers · asked by Furioso Lion88 5 in Sports ➔ Cricket
young veteran ajit agarkar [ amchi mumbai]is the best.
2007-07-30 22:43:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shane Watson becz he has performed with the ball as well as with the bat so he is best. Ajit Agarkar is good bowler but with the bat he has not performed as many times as Shane Watson.
2007-07-31 07:52:02 · answer #2 · answered by samran 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shane Watson.
2007-07-31 12:37:28 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As an all rounder Watson is better than Agarkar. Watson does a good job with both bat and ball and he is also a good fielder.
As a bowler Agarkar is better than Watson because he is more experienced than Watson and has taken more wickets than Watson. Agarkar is a good bowler.
2007-07-31 02:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by Sarang 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shane Watson is a better player than Agarker.
Watson is very useful all rounder. ajith may be a strike bowler but more than that every team need
a big hitter and a useful all rounder like Watson.
2007-07-31 16:23:58 · answer #5 · answered by Thavamayooran 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shane Watson IS THE BEST.
2007-07-31 06:22:35 · answer #6 · answered by hari 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man,Watson to speak d truth .He is young and talented all rounder.He can bats aggressively and much better than agarkar.He fields better.And he bowls like agarkar if not better.
most of all he has gr8 heart.
2007-07-31 00:32:54 · answer #7 · answered by timboom1 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
shane watson is better bowler
but as all rounder ajith best
but he has no sure place in indian team
so,watson
2007-07-31 07:04:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
shane watson is best bowler
2007-07-31 00:37:31 · answer #9 · answered by raja a 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
shane watson is best
2007-07-31 09:07:32 · answer #10 · answered by Shani 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋