I'm not sure how dope figures into the global warming picture. Anyone know?
2007-07-30 11:20:41 · 12 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
no, he will be excused by the liberals when he goes to rehab...al gore's uses more energy in one year than thousands of citizens..and Hollywood makes me sick with their hypocrisy.
2007-07-30 11:26:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
properly he has familiar from day one the technological understanding replaced into cooked and that the gig is now up. Lies uncovered and the emails coach they conspired to cook dinner the counsel. The lead Scientist Dr. Phil Jones admits - NO WARMING in view that 1995 and NO significant MEASURABLE exchange skill === NO WARMING. He is going directly to admit the MEDIEVAL era (800-1300) replaced into plenty warmer then now which DESTROYS the guy made international Warming Claims. we've entered we are in a deep, deep image voltaic minimum and the solar Spot activity has been seventy 3% no spots in 2008 and 87% no spots in 2009. Why does this count number because of the fact the solar HEATS US UP extra while their is a image voltaic optimal like the only FROM 1990-2001 PEAKING IN - DRUM ROLL PLEASE - 1995 WOW - What a twist of fate the very comparable 3 hundred and sixty 5 days that Dr. Jones reported their has been NO WARMING in view that!!! purchase your self a good heat coat because of the fact the solar is predicted to stay this replaced into till a minimum of 2030 and the international is in for some chilly.
2016-12-11 05:15:39 · answer #2 · answered by melaine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He doesn't look like a drugged person to me. But the global warming campaign for people like him is more of a political agenda. Try getting your President to stop the war because all the weapons and the smoke and the fire are contributing to changes in the climate.
2007-07-30 11:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it did, there would a footprint the size of Indiana right where the Live Earth concert was held.
2007-07-30 11:32:52 · answer #4 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I just read a con berate a lib for being so low as to mention Bush's daughters. Why is it that Chelsea and children of libs are fair game but con's children are protected? Could it be another case of hypocritical cons?
2007-07-30 11:32:46 · answer #5 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
coke gives you gas, so I am told. According to the gorescientist, farts increase global warming.
But I am sure daddy sold him some credits.
2007-07-30 17:19:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guarantee RP McMurphy wouldn't care whether that kid did drugs.
2007-07-30 11:32:55 · answer #7 · answered by 8of2kinds 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
do you think he got the drugs from one of the Bush twins?
2007-07-30 11:27:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
That is possibly the dumbest argument I've ever heard in my life.
2007-07-30 11:24:39 · answer #9 · answered by Ben Has Questions 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
sounds like the son dubya never had
2007-07-30 11:23:54 · answer #10 · answered by dr schmitty 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋