Not many people answer my questions. will you check them all out and answer some? Please?

Question

I think they are all pretty interesting. don't you? If not, then what's wrong with them?

Answer 1

Actually, I just went through your questions and I even starred one of them. I think part of the problem is you are in the philosophy forum and a lot of these people tend to look down their noses at others (pardon my judgment, but it is based upon personal experience). If your question is not deep and ponderous, then your question is not worth answering.

I answered all open ones. Move to a different forum and see if you do any better. Try one of the areas of society and culture.

Good luck!

Answer 2

Most of your questions strike me as completely hypothetical and therefore only slightly less subjective than chatting.

How can anyone answer a question like 'What would you do if the president was your uncle?' or 'Would you take over the universe?' without knowing a lot more about your hypothetical situation than that? Ultimately, everyone is left to fill in all the details of what your question is really asking, so there isn't any best answer, any more than asking 'What is your favourite colour?'.

None of which is really a problem if you're only looking for entertainment, trying to get to know people, or just dinking around. But I'm too much of a rationalist for that kind of approach to work well. We can talk about detail and interpretations, but this is a very poor place to write short pieces of complete fluff (which I do too, sometimes, under bett-erstructured circumstances... just not here).

Answer 3

well i can only see one other question besides this one - on president bush. that probably didn't get many answers cause its such a loaded question. i mean, no one realllllllly knows what he knows - so who r we to say what wed do? i mean, im sure u got a lot of 'go kill urself' answers. but really, theres just SOOO much that could answer that question ..... i wouldn't commit myself to answering it. that's why im answering this one instead :o)