I was just looking in aol for some gossip and guess what I found?
See it for yourself, and can you guys please leave stars..
http://news.aol.com/the-cooler-blog/2007/07/25/jamie-lynn-spears-pregnant/
Turns out she is not so "nickelodean" type
2007-07-30 08:17:55 · 34 answers · asked by ? 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
http://picturesofcelebrities.blogspot.com/2007/07/jamie-lynn-spears-pregnant.html
2007-07-30 08:21:12 · update #1
That is what happens when bad parents don't teach their kids how to be good.
2007-07-30 08:21:46 · answer #1 · answered by ♡LiL♥Kitten♡ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adoption is a temporary solution to a permanent problem. Abortion is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Keeping a baby you can’t afford and/or aren’t ready for is a formula for disaster Any idiot can have sex, but it takes much more to be a responsible, mature and financially stable parent. Age DOES matter! Maturity is gained through life experiences and life experiences are obtained over time. Getting knocked up doesn't magically make you mature or a responsible adult! Girls 5yrs old and up can give birth, but that doesn‘t mean they SHOULD! So don’t even think for a second that “age doesn’t matter” I would LOVE to know what 5yr old is a fit mother? Or even a 10yr old?! (website for proof) h t t p : / / e n . w i k i p e d i a . o r g / w i k i / L i s t _ o f _ y o u n g e s t _ b i r t h _ m o t h e r s abortion is simply a medical procedure to remove a parasitic organism $200-$1,000 (abortion) will save your life/future, the father’s life/future, and keep your parents from humiliation. Having a knocked up teen daughter is a failure on your parents. Do you realize that you're a direct reflection of their ability to be good parents, right? People will judge THEM by what YOU do. Keeping a baby YOU can't afford or take care of is NOT "brave", "mature" or "responsible" but it is in fact irresponsible, selfish, and just plain dumb! If your PARENTS wanted another child then THEY would have had one. If you can't care for a baby independently then you have NO business having one! Sometimes the “responsible” thing to do IS to have an abortion. Studies have shown that the MAJORITY of women/girls feel relief after abortions (I know I did!) and that guilt, complications, and regret are NOT common. Did you know just giving birth in a hospital costs thousands of dollars alone? Teens just don’t have that kind of money. ---------------- Basics for being a successful parent (the ideal situation) be at least 21 (25+ is best) be married (or have life partner) have at least $5,000 just for the baby both own cars both have careers (not just jobs) both have degrees I’m adopted, and the system is flawed! (I was lucky and got adopted into a wealthy and loving family, but that’s rare. Adoption is like dropping a pet off at the shelter, getting a family is NOT guaranteed) The world already has TOO many unwanted kids, so don’t choose adoption either. Chances are you’re kid will end up abused or on the streets anyways. I had an abortion when I was 18 and it was the best decision I ever made for myself! (I had plans and a future ahead of me) I challenge anyone to make me regret it too. ABORTIONS ARE SAFE, SIMPLE, EASY, AND NECESSARY!
2016-05-17 23:36:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh. My. Gosh. Jamie Lynn?! I didn't see her as the "get pregnant early on" type. I didn't even know she had a boyfriend! This will affect Zoey 101 BIG TIME. What are they going to do? What is Jamie Lynn going to do? This is CRAZY. How could she do that?!
They'll probably have to cancel Zoey 101, frankly because Nickelodeon will get in trouble for having a pregnant star on a very popular show. They will most likely drop Jamie Lynn too.
. . .Wow.
2007-07-30 08:23:55 · answer #3 · answered by ChaiTea 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be a shame if she was pregnant... I'm 22 and I still don't feel "grown-up" enough to even think about having children right now! However, I wouldn't take this "news" as truth just yet... the source listed for this "news" on that website is the National Enquirer, and that magazine has a reputation for creating gossip (mostly false and/or incredibly exaggerated). I guess we will all find out the truth soon though!
♥ cheers!
2007-07-30 08:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Gracie Freakin May 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK look at the source, national enquirer, not exactly known for their hard hitting hard facts, stories, she's probably having a baby that will be adopted by tomkat or brangelina and then both couples will have a large Hollywood feud over who gets the baby while Britney fights for the baby from rehab while lohan crashes her car into a cop car, unrelated story
2007-07-30 08:25:20 · answer #5 · answered by nunya b 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From what little I've heard about them [I avoid like the plague all discussions of "celebrities" and pop culture], the whole Spears family sounds like they're intellectual powerhouses, so I'm sure this newest one will be a great mother at 16 years of age.
2007-07-30 08:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really doubt that's true, for one your source being the National Enquirer isn't very legit, but as soon as you see it on the covers of US weekly and STAR then we have something to worry about, lol.
I left ya a star!!
2007-07-30 08:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
AHEM!!!
"According to the National Enquirer"
The same trustworthy source that brought you Alien Invasions and the man with 7 noses.
2007-07-30 08:21:50 · answer #8 · answered by TheEconomist 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If it's true, it's not that shocking. I don't think ppl realize how many 16 y.o. are pregnant on a yearly basis. Sex is just another extra cirricular activity to them, anymore.
2007-07-30 09:07:47 · answer #9 · answered by Violation Notice 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This kind of thing happens in families on every socioeconomic level.
Why would we be surprised to see it happen to Britney's little sister?
2007-07-30 08:27:43 · answer #10 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋