A bit like "Coals to Newcastle" is how it strikes me. There are plenty of gays in jail already. Now they want to encourage more homosexual behavior? I guess the "cavity search" gets the "foreplay" out of the way and they can get right to the buggering. What about the right of heterosexuals to not be exposed to such sick bastards? I have witnessed homosexual acts when I was in jail, and beleive me, nothing inflames more hatred of the system than being forced to observe some deviants do each other . And the smell? Nasty as nasty gets.
Having these sickos behavior sanctioned by law is just plain "stupido." It will encourage more rape and more violence than already happens. Yeah,sure, let's all jump in the handbasket and go straight to hell. Form a line and get your tickets punched by the big ole Latin lover at the rear. Ole!
2007-07-30 08:25:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, if hetero couples are allowed conjugal visits then of course gay couples should be allowed conjugal visits.
Second, I feel going to jail is punishment. Although it should also be a place for rehabilitation. I think if used properly conjugal visits could be a good tool to maintain peace and promote rehabilitation.
♂♂
2007-07-30 07:19:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tegarst 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think any conjugal visits should be allowed in any prison.. after all you are PAYING for a crime, not on vacation. But that wasn't the question. If they are allowing conjugal visits at all I don't see what the difference is. A lover is a lover is it not?
2007-07-30 07:04:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by tan0301 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm skeptical since Mexico does not have a great human rights record regarding GBLT folks. I'd worry this is a way to identify other gays so they could be followed, assaulted or disappeared.
In North America or anywhere else, such a program would leave gays wide open to violence from other inmates. Being in jail is definitely a don't tell environment.
2007-07-30 07:14:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by gone fishing 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
good for them. it somewhat is approximately time that folk be allowed to do what they %. If heterosexuals could have conjugal visits, so might desire to all and sundry else. I understand that it somewhat is not the U. S. we are speaking approximately, and that maximum folk of the inhabitants of Mexico are deeply non secular Catholics, in spite of the indisputable fact that it would look to me which you're in choose of discriminating against gays in basic terms on non secular grounds. properly, hell, maximum discrimination is often in keeping with non secular grounds. it somewhat is in basic terms that the human beings doing the discrimination are not very non secular and that they rattling particular won't be in a position to study what it somewhat is that they profess to be so non secular approximately. yet hi, it particularly is faith for you.
2016-10-13 02:55:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see why not. These people are stuck in prison, missing the people they care about. I think it should be allowed. If straight people can visit their partners, why can't gays have the right to visit theirs?
2007-07-30 07:03:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by consumingfire783 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well seeing as conjugal visits are to prevent rape then YES! The less men in jail with sexual frustration the less rape.
2007-07-30 07:20:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Emily 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, but we don't have any gays in prison. If a gay does something wrong, he gets a heavily reduced sentence because we need to be "understanding" of the hard life he's had to contend with.
2007-07-30 07:04:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's Mexico they let all sorts of deviant things happen down there!!! Next you'll be asking if we should let anyone who wants to perform plastic surgery do so just because they watched it done on TV!
2007-07-30 07:05:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Prison should be prison. You should not be rewarded. Even if it was heterosexual conjugal visits, they should not be allowed any where anytime.
2007-07-30 07:04:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋