English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Tell me what you think.....I think the baby boomers will elect Hillary Clinton. This is her weapon to win against Obama.
The baby boomers are older and wiser, plenty in number, will go to the polls and unerstand what this country needs.
Please refrain from using profanity or cutting down dems and Mrs Clinton all you repubs out there, ok?

2007-07-30 06:30:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

13 answers

yes I do believe that Hillary will be our next president due to the baby boomers . good luck .

2007-07-30 06:35:41 · answer #1 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 1 5

Hillary Clinton is very electable and more than likely will get the Democratic nomination. She will probably get the largest majority of the baby boomer vote and I predict her to be the next President of the US. But I like Obama, too. He will probably be her VP. She has not been shaken in the debates yet. She's a very intelligent woman and can hold her own with any politician the Republicans throw at her. I do love the fact that no one can seem to be able to rattle her. That's an asset.

2007-07-30 14:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 14 2

II am a democratic baby boomer and I will not be voting for Clinton. If she becomes the democratic candidate I will have to vote republican. Keep in mind the "baby boomers" grew up hearing about and seeing the Clintons in action. In spite of the fact we were far better off under President Clinton at his worst than we have been under Bush at his best Hillary is a different person. Bill had credibility from his background, education and real experience. Hillary claims experience but none shows any benefit; most shows trouble for her and her associates. Meeting with world leaders only means she was properly positioned as the first lady; what did we gain from it, what long lasting benefits did it have? She tried as first lady to get a national Health Program through and failed; as a Senator she still could not do so. What has she accomplished as a Senator? I am amazed at how candidates think that making proposals or submitting bills means a thing; if they are not acted on or approved they have wasted their time and tax payers money. We remember the things she was involved in before and during the White House; we have had enough of that with Bush. Other candidates have excellent records of public service in office and out of politics. They have recorded experience that shows they were in it because they were needed not because it was a good political thing to do. Most of them were working at making America a better place for everyone while Clinton was defending herself. She has been part of the procrastinating government we have suffered with for the past seven years; we do not need another person who feels so comfortable starting and participating in arguments and degrading others. We need a person, any color, any sex, any age, which can lead a nation and regain world respect; lawfully and by example.

2007-07-30 16:55:55 · answer #3 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 5 7

I convinced a whole family last night after dinner, to vote for Ron Paul, they said they were voting for Hillary. I asked why, and they said she would go around the world and talk with people (she can speak well), and she is pretty (I disagree).

It was a very simpleminded reason. I then asked how would we afford all the government entitlements she would bring. Then told them how she changes her accent when she goes area to area to "fit in". Showed examples of it on youtube. Then asked her how you think she would talk to people in muslim countries, when they have no respect for women?

They finally asked me who I was voting for... I didn't say the name at first, just showed them a couple candidates stances and past. They picked Ron Paul on thier own. They are baby boomers, they are intelligent, but they believe the TV far too much.

2007-07-30 13:37:53 · answer #4 · answered by ThomasS 5 · 3 4

She may get the nod from the Democratic Party but she will not survive debate against the Republican Candidate.

She carries entirely too much baggage for most Americans to even consider her as President.

2007-07-30 13:45:00 · answer #5 · answered by labdoctor 5 · 6 4

For all of her advantages, she will not win the nomination. She is too polarizing a figure in America. Her numbers with men and independents are low and running aganst an african-american hurts also. When put up against the 3 main rep canidates, she loses. Also I think the country is tried of Bush/Clinton and want a new name and face. And there will be lots of people who go against her b/c they fear Bill having more intern issues.

2007-07-30 13:39:39 · answer #6 · answered by bmvel13 1 · 3 8

No, I do not believe that she will win. She is virtually unelectable in the south, and I think she'll even have a suprisingly tough time in the rust belt.

2007-07-30 13:39:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 6

Boomers know better than to make the same mistake twice!

Old BJ Clinton was a failure, why elect another self-serving Clinton?

2007-07-30 13:54:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 11

my novel was just supressed

there is no free speech or free press in america

the constitution is a lie

2007-07-30 13:37:50 · answer #9 · answered by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2 · 2 6

i am a baby boomer and no way i would vote for wanta be Queen billary

2007-07-30 16:15:41 · answer #10 · answered by jessedakota 3 · 3 10

fedest.com, questions and answers