English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Maybe the NIST should take speak with demolition experts in Italy because they seem to have a good idea:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0

NIST admits that fire was not likely to be the cause of the collapse of WTC 7 and that more testing would be needed. They are scheduled to release their final report at the end of the year

2007-07-30 06:09:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

In response to Caligstro or whatever his name is this is from the NIST website:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Question: 14. Why is the NIST investigation of the collapse of WTC 7 (the 47-story office building that collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001, hours after the towers) taking so long to complete? Is a controlled demolition hypothesis being considered to explain the collapse?

Answer: When NIST initiated the WTC investigation, it made a decision not to hire new staff to support the investigation. After the June 2004 progress report on the WTC investigation was issued, the NIST investigation team stopped working on WTC 7 and was assigned full-time through the fall of 2005 to complete the investigation of the WTC towers. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements.

2007-07-30 07:50:22 · update #1

5 answers

I wouldn't put my money on this!

2007-07-30 06:47:38 · answer #1 · answered by chrisvoulg1 5 · 3 2

The NIST claimed no such thing.

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html

"An initial local failure occurred at the lower floors (below floor 13) of the building due to fire and/or debris induced structural damage of a critical column (the initiating event) which supported a large span floor bay with an area of about 2,000 square feet;

Vertical progression of the initial local failure occurred up to the east penthouse, as the large floor bays were unable to redistribute the loads, bringing down the interior structure below the east penthouse; and

Horizontal progression of the failure across the lower floors (in the region of floors 5 and 7, that were much thicker than the rest of the floors), triggered by damage due to the vertical failure, resulting in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure."



Hey, don't let facts get into the way of your rant.


Cheerio!

2007-07-30 14:04:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

David- what is disrespectful to the victims and families of 911 is the bull_s_hit official story that is being handed to them as the truth by our murderous government's administration.

*

2007-07-30 13:29:38 · answer #3 · answered by >Golden Ticket< 4 · 3 1

The flat-earthers continue to amaze me!

2007-07-30 13:36:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Please read http://www.911myths.com/. Please stop the disrespect to the people that lost friends and family on 9/11. It is beyond insensitive.

2007-07-30 13:17:28 · answer #5 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers