The entire world is controlled by the races that won the genocidal/conquest wars of the new millenium. In America the 'great' Aztec and Incan empires were the product of recent conquest during which entire people ceased to exist(the Toltecs, Olmecs, and Maya) they were barbaric societies based on slavery and human sacrifice. In Africa most people do not realize that what we think of as black "Africans" originated in a thin belt below the Sahara, they pushed the native Bushmen(which were closer to the Aboriginies of Australia) into the desert enslaving and killing them along the way, then they pushed south creating societies BASED on slavery and conquest, Europeans reached the southern tip before blacks did, whent he first explorers reached the Cape, the closest blacks were over a hundred miles away in Natale. In the middle east the Muslims created a new soceity based on Islam and the rapid conquest of others, and went on to inslave and kill over 8 million 'Africans.'
2007-07-30
04:10:48
·
11 answers
·
asked by
ben s
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
In the East Chinese killed and conquered not only each other but also Koreans and Vietnamese. In Japan the 'Japanese' wiped out(commited genocide) the native Anui people who were cacausian. there were also cacausians in America who probobly crossed from Siberia who were slaughtered by the 'native americans,' make you think huh.
2007-07-30
04:14:32 ·
update #1
You put it in perspective. It does makes me think. It is not a European/Christian phenomenon, it is a human phenomenon. With the enormous power of today's weapons, what is one to think?
Should we strive to change the genes, would it be worth it? would it work? What else could we do?
2007-08-06 11:47:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by johnfarber2000 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The English and the Americans took the lead in ABOLISHING slavery.
Unfortunately, it still exists in a few places today. Like the Sudan.
I would think that any energy should be spent trying to eradicate it in the present rather than discuss where it used to exist in the past.
Yes, some people don't know their history very well.
2007-07-30 11:18:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess cuz we're in america we're more related to christians and erupenas conquering the aztecs adn the native americas
2007-08-07 02:32:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Confused Chick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It really has nothing to do with race or religion. What you are saying is that when two different cultures meet, the stronger will wipe out the weakers,
2007-08-02 04:38:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by xg6 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yep, it makes me think. it makes me think that you should stop attending online universities for your history lessons. many of your facts are simply not accurate. i don't have time to prove it right now, but after a bit of research, i may get back to ya, if i deem it worth the time.
the short of it is this, i don't think people consider it phenomenon at all, that't your personal deduction. it's just that in modern day history, african american descendants of slavery are palpable beings who in many cases continue to suffer the after effects of the conquest/convert/slave travesty.
finally, i believe that the important fact is not whether it's a phenomenon but the actual that whether asian, native, nazi, etc. stripping people of their property, land, religion, spirituality, language, culture, customs, etc is morally & spiritually wrong & eventually, divine intervention judges such practices & individuals are judged accordingly.
2007-08-03 14:19:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Can you source your assertion that there were caucasions in the americas before the vikings?
I have looked for proof of this and have found nothing so far..thx!!
2007-08-06 19:42:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by amrankwit 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get a grip, Ben. People, not just Christians, are bad enough without distorting the historical facts.
2007-07-30 11:18:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Who Else? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The vikings were known for rapeing and pillageing. So does that mean that any medieval army that took a settlement did not rape and pillage?
2007-08-07 11:03:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Leonidis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is easier to believe someone else did it than to admit your own people did it.
2007-08-07 09:27:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lisa M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
that might be true, but that doesn't mean that europeans/christians didn't do it too, or that it was ok.
2007-07-30 11:14:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋