so they simply rehash whatever is in the Blog ........ how lazy is that? No wonder Gerry posts something every day or the journalists wouldnt bother writing about them at all.
I'd still love to know who's paying for the relatives to keep flying out to the Algarve each week ........or does it fall under
1.1.3 To provide support, including financial assistance, to Madeleine’s family.
2007-07-30 03:17:39 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It is the same as the concert that was held for Madeleine's funds, they expected over 6000 people to turn up for it, only 80 turned out. The Mc's was expecting to raise £35k from it. So that is telling the 'Team McCann.' Something.
2007-07-30 03:22:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 3⤋
Why must everything be about Gerry and Kate. Madeleine is still missing. All this was suppose to be about helping Gerry and Kate find her, but of course this has only lined their own pockets. Have they no shame??????????
2007-08-02 21:38:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyonelse think that Eden really seems to be carrying around some sort of residual envy when it comes to Dave S? Get a life.Only two months ago your posts were hardly supportive of the McCanns....Now all you seem to do is attack everyone who agrees with Dave. What is your problem?
Dave may be obsessed with this case but you seem to be obsessed with the attention he is getting and all of your posts on this subject are nothing short of vicious.
2007-07-30 05:34:50 · answer #3 · answered by Maxwell T 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nothing about Madeleine McCann's family is remotely funny.
Its heart-rending, its tragic, its sad and its sorrowful.
It is not funny.
And if anyone is running out of stories about this grieving family & rehashing stuff, its just YOU.
2007-07-30 21:19:07 · answer #4 · answered by Faith 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most people gave to the fund to "Find Madeleine" not the McCann fund
I should have read the small print - point 1.1.3
2007-07-30 03:46:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
It comes out of Madeleines fund, nice huh!They are now trying to sell her fund name.Faith why do you grumble at everyone who raises a valid point ,then write a strongly worded poem about the McCanns.
2007-07-30 03:19:57 · answer #6 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 8⤊ 4⤋
What a shame that sky cant display some real journo skill, and ASK some questions about what really transpired on the 3rd of May. Too much to ask i suppose.
Funny how the worlds "Premier" News channel must tug its collective forelock to Lord Mccann.
2007-07-30 03:24:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 5⤋
I reckon it falls under 1.1.3 but I have noticed they have clarified the control of the funds being within a set guideline for good practice for not for pofit non charities now so I assume it isn't going straight into their current account
2007-07-30 03:21:17 · answer #8 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 8⤊ 5⤋
I must admit I DID think it was the parents fault at first, it was silly of them to leave their children un attended in the appartment, but do you know what? Those 2 people, regardless of how and what happened have lost a precious child. People can slate them and dislike them and slag them off all they want, but at the end of it the ONLY thing that matters is that poor kiddie away from her family going through god only knows what. Whether you support them or not think about Maddy and not the parents. Sky are bound to run out of things to put as there is no leads on where the child is. Put yourself in their position and think just how would you feel if it was your child missing.
2007-07-30 03:29:14 · answer #9 · answered by Su John 2 · 2⤊ 12⤋
Or put another way - the professional journalists are no longer flogging this to death, it's just the sad internet geeks who think they are something special who, keep going on and on and on and on about it.
What are you going to do with your life once this is all over?
2007-07-30 03:32:36 · answer #10 · answered by ShuggieMac 5 · 5⤊ 10⤋