I think it would of hurt the republicans and it did but I agreed with the judges on how they did the impeachment they did not jump the gun like the lib's are doing now.
2007-07-30 03:15:44 · 9 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thats why I agreed on the terms of impeachment they had facts the lib's don't they just make it up.
2007-07-30 03:28:43 · update #1
that acually makes things worse for Dem's because thoes files are not for other eyes than the presidents.
2007-07-30 03:30:57 · update #2
I do not support the impeachment of Bush, as nobody else would be as good at sinking the Neocons into oblivion.
2007-07-30 03:20:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the case of President Clinton, the impeachment process was misused. Abused for political punishment.
In the case of bush, this is precisely what impeachment was designed for. To take out a President who is impugning the almost-sacred office and disregarding over two centuries of precedent.
bush is behaving like a despot, and this is simply NOT tolerable in America. He has made a mockery of our tradition of three branches of government. He has circumvented the entire checks-and-balances system which is the ONLY reason this country has survived as long as it has.
2007-07-30 10:30:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say the libs are jumping the gun.. but if they do the impeachment and make it a personal attack as the republicans did..then yes, it will hurt them the same way... Impeachment isn't some toy to be thrown around and shouldn't be used unless it is absolutely 100% certain that it is the correct and ethical course of action.
2007-07-30 10:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by pip 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Impeaching Clinton was a big mistake the Republicans have been paying for ever since with the tit-for-tat smelly stuff going on in Washington while the world and our country are going down the drain!
2007-07-30 10:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
so the whole point of your question was to say the libs are jumping the gun now.... I guess they are doing this with the whole not bringing charges against the president and not starting impeachment procedures? How are they jumping the gun? Also what exactly is you're question?
2007-07-30 10:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think the whole Clinton debacle was a witch hunt. And I think Bush should not be impeached but should be made to turn over any records not concerning national security and get out of the way of people asked to testify.
2007-07-30 10:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was Impeached by the House for Perjury and Obstruction of Justice, but not convicted by the Senate.
There were no judges.
2007-07-30 10:20:51 · answer #7 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He didn't get impeached. He lied under oath just like Nixon did. But, Nixon resigned before they did so.
2007-07-30 10:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If this is about Clinton, then as a parent, if it's not safe to send one of my children to work in the White House because the President will sexually prey on her, then the President should be removed.
2007-07-30 10:26:17 · answer #9 · answered by jimmymae2000 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋