English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Look at the following videos, proving controlled demolition
and an "inside job" false-flag fabricated terror attack on 9/11:

http://www.truth911.net

Watch the 90 minute films:

9/11 Mysteries

Loose Change 2

Terror Storm 2

and look at these ABC News videos & amateur videos

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=molten+metal+wtc&search=Search


showing MOLTEN METAL dripping out of the South Tower,
just moments before its complete free-fall collapse right down
to the ground... Steel has a melting point of 1532 Celcius, but
open air fires (due to limited oxygen supply) only burn as hot
as 233 - 250 Celcius... not even hot enough to start softening
steel at 300 Celcius! SO HOW COULD AIR FIRE MELT
STEEL? when you all know that your cooking pots and pans
and BBQ hotplates made of steel do not melt, or glow yellow
or red hot when exposed to air fire? HOW?

Why is it people are too stubborn to accept this physical
evidence that proves an inside job?

2007-07-30 03:01:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

Why would you believe a government
that has LIED to you about the following?

- The Bush connection to the bin Laden family.

- Escorting dozens of members of the bin Laden family out of US after 9/11

- The Patriot Act having been written decades before 9/11

- The call for a ‘new Pearl Harbor’ by the neocons who orchestrated the wars

- A totally invalid and false connection between Iraq and the ‘War on Terror

- Regular, politically timed terror alerts

- Toxic air quality at Ground Zero after 9/11

- The ‘junk science’ of Global Warming and its effects around the globe

- WH orders to suppress and politicize reports on by the Surgeon General

- Plans for wars with Iraq and Afghanistan that were made before 9/11

- Saddam Hussein’s possession of WMD

- Saddam Hussein’s connection to Al Qaeda

- Saddam Hussein’s involvement in 9/11

- Saddam Hussein’s threat to the US or his neighbors

2007-07-30 03:05:14 · update #1

- Having NO plans for an extended occupation of Iraq or for keeping the peace

- Inadequate armor and supplies for our men and women in uniform

- Supposed ‘progress’ in Iraq, time after time

- Fudged numbers of civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq

- The staged ‘toppling’ of Saddam’s statue

- The staged rescue of Jessica Lynch

- The lies about Pat Tillman’s death by friendly fire

- Illegal warrantless spying on US citizens

- Torture at Abu Ghraib and other prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan

- Rendition of detainees to other countries for torture

- Outing Valerie Plame as a CIA operative

- White House involvement in the firing of federal prosecutors…

There are so many more lies to list, but I think you get the idea.

Don't forget the many fake Bin Laden
videos!!!

2007-07-30 03:06:18 · update #2

So, after becoming aware of lie after lie after lie by Bushco, why would anyone in his or her right mind FULLY EMBRACE THE OFFICIAL STORY OF WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11 WITHOUT A

SINGLE QUESTION? Why would anyone in the United Sates of America conclude that the official version of the most important event in recent American history AS TOLD BY PROVEN LIARS is true?

Could it be, that many Bush supporters
are in a state of DENIAL? Cognitive
dissonance? Be unwilling to accept the
facts and material evidence, because
that would mean the US Government
aided and abetted (even covered up)
the mass-murder of almost 3000
innocent VICTIMS on 9/11 ? All for the
sake of starting unnecessary wars for
profit, and controlling the oil in the middle
east, and for giving "elites" unlimited
dictatorship powers and a new police
state?

Think about it! Wire tapping, spying
on US citizens, legalized torture of
people who COULD be harmful without
any need for evidence. It's NAZISM!

2007-07-30 03:11:38 · update #3

So, after becoming aware of lie after lie after lie by Bushco, why would anyone in his or her right mind FULLY EMBRACE THE OFFICIAL STORY OF WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11 WITHOUT A

SINGLE QUESTION? Why would anyone in the United Sates of America conclude that the official version of the most important event in recent American history AS TOLD BY PROVEN LIARS is true?

Could it be, that many Bush supporters
are in a state of DENIAL? Cognitive
dissonance? Be unwilling to accept the
facts and material evidence, because
that would mean the US Government
aided and abetted (even covered up)
the mass-murder of almost 3000
innocent VICTIMS on 9/11 ? All for the
sake of starting unnecessary wars for
profit, and controlling the oil in the middle
east, and for giving "elites" unlimited
dictatorship powers and a new police
state?

Think about it! Wire tapping, spying
on US citizens, legalized torture of
people who COULD be harmful without
any need for evidence. It's NAZISM!

2007-07-30 03:11:39 · update #4

5 answers

Assuming that what you propose has any more truth to it than anything the current or past administration has put forth, what do you expect would happen if the majority of citizens were convinced 9/11 was an inside job?

Overthrow the government? With what? Our military is run by generals who are loyal to Bush.

If the purpose of posing this question was to enlighten the American public you damn well better have a plan for what happens next.

"As scarce as the truth is, supply is always greater than demand".

2007-07-30 03:20:12 · answer #1 · answered by lunatic 7 · 1 0

So what you're telling me is that I should disregard my 8+ years of mechanical/structural engineering undergraduate and graduate education, along with experience in construction management and project develpment? And believe a couple propaganda websites who's "proof" is based on uneducated people suggesting results based off of some video and pictures?

And don't get me started on the steel. Unless you are a licensed structural engineer or have studied the effects heat and fire has on steel at different strengths, alloys, annealment, etc. (which I have), then I'm going to assume you're ignorant. Try educating yourself and read some PUBLISHED material on steel properties, and the effect of heat on these properties, and I think you'll be surprised. Again, get your information from a published source, not a propaganda website, or even wikipedia for that matter.

You're "physical evidence proof" is anything but. Go to school, learn about controlled demolition, heat transfer and its effect on steel structures under pressure, the ignition point and full combustion temperature of Jet A jet fuel used in Boeing 767's, design construction and development of buildings such as the WTC towers, the mechanics of steel and concrete under pressure, as well as structural engineering involving steel and concrete......and then, and ONLY THEN, may you post an educated conclusion of your own involving the events of September 11th, and not something some ignorant conspiracy theorists cooked up who have absolutely zero knowledge pertaining to the subject.

2007-07-30 10:14:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The question is why do you believe this conspiracy nonsense? To take just one point, open air fires burn a lot hotter than 250C - typically between 750C (a red flame) to about 1700C (a blue flame). The temperature is why the flame gives out light!!! So if you believe that rubbish about flames...

2007-07-30 10:15:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yea I get the idea..you're a nut job conspiracist.

2007-07-30 10:12:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Because they are too dumb to realize their government is controlled by criminals.

2007-07-30 10:06:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers