No, we are moving mass containing and exerting energy.
And why is this in astronomy and space, lol?
2007-07-30 02:15:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by 1337 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The living part of it may not necessarily be energy.
A river or a waterfall would be moving energy.
If you could turn a person into pure energy in a couple of seconds the explosion would do major damage to the surface of the earth.
So I guess,yes.
2007-07-30 02:46:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could say that in a poetic sense. As has been pointed out, in modern physics essentially everything that exists is in some sense a form of energy. But be careful where all this new-agey stuff is taking you: there is no evidence that life itself is a "force" or "energy"; it's more of a compex organizing principle.
2007-07-30 02:54:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well mass is energy: E=Mc^2. So yes that describtion fits. But energy is not a physical property in the same way mass and other properties are so maybe not the best describtion to use. wavelength = h (plancks constant)/Momentum. so you also have a wavelength when you move work it out.
2007-07-30 02:18:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Booboo64 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say we are more like terrestrial elements. e.g. metals have evolved by heating and cooling at different temperatures. take water for example water. water is made of 1 hydrogen and 2 oxygen put together by heating and cooling. life was probably some of these gases that got together due to the temperatures at certain parts of the universe. eventually because of the complex nature of the element, it found ways to evolve into even more complex objects. fact: bacterias have been found that are made entirely of gases that are combined to form what seems like a cell. they are thought to be the most primitive form of life.
2007-07-31 05:18:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are independent atoms.
belonging to the universe of atoms, .
and in around about way creating energy by installing food, which is more atoms' and human cannot explain the force and blue print of this mystery
2007-07-30 02:22:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by denis9705 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the mass part of them is still mass until it is converted to energy. So they are potential energy.
2007-07-30 02:17:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think you could say that. Deepak Chopra HAS said that.
2007-07-30 03:26:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-07-30 03:02:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by kNOTaLIAwyR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋