Bush says that he will let the Generals in the military decide how best to proceed in Iraq. Does that mean that he would prefer a military dicatorship in foriegn affairs? I thought the President was the Commander in cheif, and that the Generals are supposed to follow the course set by civilian leadership.
It looks like Bush is revealing the true nature of what's going on in the White House. He's depending on someone else to tell him what to do on every issue he's called on to decide.
2007-07-29
23:46:53
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics