UN never made an settlement. Legal disputes are made by the power of the guns or should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice, in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Court.
2007-08-02 14:10:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by L U K E 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the Korean war was a UN-backed war that was settled. So was the first gulf war. The Balkans have also settled down because of the UN presence. The UN has a large part in the Isreali-Palestine peace process. There are many peacekeeping operations around the world. Cyprus, Western Sahara, Ethiopia/Eritrea, and Haiti are peackeeping missions trying to settle disputes between nations.
2007-07-30 08:32:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by DetroiterGuy 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
(Zachary B said: )
"the Korean war was a UN-backed war that was settled. So was the first gulf war. The Balkans have also settled down because of the UN presence. The UN has a large part in the Isreali-Palestine peace process. There are many peacekeeping operations around the world. Cyprus, Western Sahara, Ethiopia/Eritrea, and Haiti are peackeeping missions trying to settle disputes between nations. "
( ANSWER: )
N and S Korea are still officially at war, at one of the most armed and hostile borders in the world, that could explode into war at any time.
The U.N. Gulf War peace agreement, weapons inspectors and sanctions, in their utter ineffectiveness, compelled the United States to invade Iraq with a "Coalition of the willing" in March 2003, because of Saddam Husein's ongoing defiance, and publicly defiant rejection of UN inspectors, and stated pursuit of WMD's (although later found to be bravado on Saddam's part, and not real weapons, although the David Kay report showed that Iraq was in material breach of U.N. prohibitions on WMD's in the form of WMD weapons research, and was ready to go into WMD production, at any point where UN sanctions would have been lifted, and sanctions were crumbling).
The Balkans was solved by U.S. intervention, and the U.N. only became effective after the U.S. led the way.
The U.N role in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict has largely been to take Palestine's side.
People are starving and subject to warlords and revolution in Somalia and elsewhere in Africa.
I don't see where any of these are examples of effective U.N. leadership.
The U.N. is only successfully and overwhelmingly anti-American and hostile to the interests of the United States.
2007-07-31 08:57:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stiffler 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
The UN rarely settles anything. They make a strongly worded resolution and then one of the security council will have to actually do something about it.
After the country in suspect has broken the resolution many times.
2007-07-29 23:12:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by WCSteel 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You can't find anything good for the world that the UN has done. Not one thing
A corrupt, usless org filled with do nothing socialist and 1 world order supporters
2007-07-31 01:02:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by BUILD THE WALL 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Palestinian crises, North and South Korea, Indian-Pakistani conflict, Iraq war and Afghanistan war.
2007-08-02 18:13:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do not solve anything. The UN is useless.
They put our resolution after resolution and it has NO teeth. Then they want America to fix it (even though the world hates us).
I say throw them all out of NY and use the building for affordable housing.
2007-07-29 23:57:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The conflict in somalia and also the civil war in rwanda.
2007-07-29 22:56:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋