... later as she planned to run for office?
2007-07-29 22:15:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't know, don't care...
But F.Y.I, I wouldn't exactly vote for someone who couldn't even manage her own household let alone the whole country...
2007-07-29 22:19:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There's a very famous story about comedianne George Burns' wife, Gracie Allen.
When Gracie found out George had been unfaithful to him, she pressured him into buying her a really, really expensive necklace she had her eyes on. She later told her friends she wished George would cheat again, because she wanted the matching ear rings!
I think Hillary is in the same boat.
She knew she could get political mileage out of staying with Bill (even though their marriage is a sham, and have separate beds, and usually separate bedrooms). Hillary always tries to capitalize on the chance to play the victim and get pity votes. Here's one that reveals her true, vile nature:
After 9-11, Hillary claimed that she was completely distraught because her daughter Chelsea was visiting a friend right around Ground Zero. Hillary claimed she spent agonizing hours not knowing if Chelsea was dead or alive.
Bunk!
Any savvy person would realize that, Chelsea has Secret Service protection, and that it would never take more than two minutes to reach her. Also, Hillary knew this friend lived about a mile from the WTC. So, Hillary lied through her teeth because she wanted to capitalize on her chance to play the long-suffering, devout mother, just like she got to play the resolute, "Stand By Your Man" woman with Bill.
So, when George Burns cheated, Gracie was ebbulent about her chance to get that jewelry. When Bill Clinton cheated, Hillary was jumping for joy at her newfound opportunity to use that as more leverage to get into the White House (without a Visitor's Pass or a crowbar).
2007-07-30 05:43:13 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton could have benefitted from the philandering of Bill Clinton since she became famous and it is an advantage for her campaign to run as President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-07-30 05:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course, this isn't the first time "Slick willy" has been popped by his manly looking wife, notice she didn't "Divorce" him ? any other woman would have. "Hillary didn't want that because, it would ruin her chance at running a country under "Fascism", she decided it would make her lose her power base, so she decided on the "Pity vote", and the "I'm a strong woman like Oprah" platform.
2007-07-30 05:22:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is very interesting to see people who claim to believe in family values take such delight in an act that could break up a family - and then attack the family for deciding to stay together.
2007-07-30 06:03:15 · answer #5 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean the same Hillary who claims to have championed women's causes all of her life . . . evidently, by staying married to a philanderer. Yeah, that really advanced the cause of women!
2007-07-30 05:30:21 · answer #6 · answered by Steve C 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nobody pity's her, She probably could care less. What the clintons have is a marriage of convienance... She will reap what she sows......
2007-07-30 05:18:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not, she learned to be a better wife so she wouldn't get cheated on anymore I hope.
2007-07-30 05:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, she celebrated right alongside of bill and Monica.
2007-07-30 05:24:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a career politician like her, it's possible. But it's more likely that she stayed with him so she would receive his support when she ran.
2007-07-30 05:33:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋