I know the dog fighting occured on his property in Virginia. and I know its something really serious but so far all I've hearing is there is evidence and they have witnesses. Now heres what I see is wrong with this, they dont have any hard evidence other than he say she say that Vick was there. And if (not saying he was there) he was there and a witness seen him, could it be possible that they made a bet on a dog Vicks cousin had bet against and lost and want to get back at Vick instead or even worst if this person knows he was there shouldnt they face charges too for being at an illegal event such as that ? I dunno, im a huge vick fan and a pray he gets out of this, If he did it I dont think its right at all & He should do his time.Also the US has been trying to ban pit bulls from the US and put them down too so at the same time its hypocritical in this situation too.
Can someone talk me through this instead of saying Vick should die for it if you dont know for hes guilty or not?
2007-07-29 21:42:48 · 2 answers · asked by Doc Dre 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Sorry to let you know, but the governing body that really counts has found him guilty. The National Football League and the NFL Union investigates these matters very thoroughly and they seem sure he did wrong. In fact, he is not even protesting.
The NFL does not have the authority to put him in prison but they can and will shut down his football career.
He appears to have broken animal cruelty laws, gambling laws, tax laws, and likely substance laws.
If he gets the same judge as Martha Stewart, he is in deep trouble.
2007-07-31 10:29:40 · answer #1 · answered by Menehune 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obivously there is sufficient info and witness testimony because of the fact this went formerly a grand jury earlier to the indictment being filed. And once you study the indictment it is not only one canine it somewhat is extremely somewhat some them he subsidized. the only element that he can say is that he's in basic terms named online #eighty 3 as particularly killing a canine yet all of them have been named in this line in a huge date variety so as which would be demanding to tutor yet some a lot of human beings already have faith he killed the canines himself. yet at present court docket of public opinion does not care approximately harmless till shown accountable in a court docket of regulation. individually after analyzing the indictment he's in a international of difficulty as for the conspiracy factor of the expenses.
2016-10-13 02:20:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋