English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Over the long run, riskier (more volatile) investments have a greater return than lower risk investments. For example, in any period that's long enough, stocks trounce bonds. The theory is that people won't put money in riskier investments if they don't get rewarded with higher returns.

2007-07-29 20:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by Houyhnhnm 6 · 1 0

Investments that are safe don't return you as much money. Generally the more risk you take the higher potential return you expect. e.g. If you can get 5% return on an guaranteed government bond then in order for you to buy a bond from a corporation (which has more risk than the government) they would have to temp you with more than 5%. For bonds risk also relates to the length of the bond e.g. the longer the term before you get your investment the risker the investment is. There is a greater chance of inflation, interest rates going up, the company going out of business etc. So usually, a short term bond will pay you less because your risk is less.


The same holds true with stocks - usually investing in a major global company's stock would be less risky and therefore you should expect a lower returen than investing in a unknown new company.

2007-08-03 14:19:49 · answer #2 · answered by J 4 · 0 0

It depends on your own definition of risk and reward. The more risk you can take the less risky it is. If your stake was $100 and you could make $50 more or lose $50 by investing would you think this was risky? How about +/- $40, or +/-$30? How about investing $100 and either making $80 or losing everything, which is more risky to you? The more information you have about an investment the less risky it should be, if it is accurate information.
Usually high risk means high potential return, but potential is the "disclaimer" word.

2007-07-30 03:04:35 · answer #3 · answered by ireland 2 · 0 0

Im undecided the place you reside so the words may well be diverse than us of a. a central authority bond often has a 14 year + strengthen era The CD marketplace is quite low like a million% whilst costs of interest circulate up those will too. Corp bonds Muni bonds and mutual fund Bond money generate interest 5-10%, super once you retire as a circulate of earnings. ordinary Mutual money are bought in family individuals's:like leading edge, or Lord Abbott they have a team of shares which makes a speciality of a sector or strengthen or value shares besides as mixed money with bonds. those can drop in value and that i've got no longer had plenty success with them. Then theres inventory, i do no longer understand what you advise via "Overnite Investments"??? desire that facilitates. edit* Ck into paying for an Index fund like the S&P (undercover agent), or a organization you think of will do o.k. over here couple of years(with a dividend) or Bershire Hathaway, permit Warren Buffet do your paintings

2016-10-13 02:14:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you put it all on red you can double your money quick. You can lose it all just as quick. If you stuff your money into a savings account you won't lose anything in dollars but you won't make more than inflation and might make less. You have to gamble some to win the more risk your money will take the greater the swing in outcomes.

2007-07-29 20:05:32 · answer #5 · answered by shipwreck 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers