and facilitating genocide and ethnic cleansing in Iraq right?
2007-07-29 17:36:06 · 9 answers · asked by me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
From a moral perspective, the argument would be that the unborn has harmed nobody, and has not yet chosen a religion -- so they could not rationally be killed for having chosen the wrong religion, or for associating with the wrong people.
But I would consider it rampant hypocrisy it the people advocating genocide spared pregnant women, only to kill the women and the children after the baby was born -- kinda defeats the purpose.
2007-07-29 17:40:35 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If America was indeed facilitating genocide and ethnic cleansing in Iraq then it would be wrong. If you do not posses the basic intellectual capability to decipher the difference between unintended consequences due to warfare and an intentional act of murder due to your own circumstances being inconvenient then I don't know how you piss without wetting yourself.
Obviously your question was a political statement to begin with but it really does make you look and sound extraordinarily stupid.
2007-07-30 00:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by billy d 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who said abortion is wrong. It is right if it is not against parents' wishes. It is legal almost everywhere.
Iraq is a completely different issue. What is happening in Iraq is no way comparable to getting an abortion done... So this question is not really relevant.
2007-07-30 00:41:14 · answer #3 · answered by Subhasis G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in either. Nor do I make the rules. However, I don't think it's the USA that's doing the genocide. There were religious tensions long before we were there.
2007-07-30 00:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by LIGER20498 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WHAT ?? Abortion has nothing to do with fighting for freedom, sorry.
But to help you understand the portion of regarding abortion, let me explain it in terms that you will understand. Please write me when your dog gets pregnant. Even if it was an accident. I think there are too many dogs in the World so when yours gets pregnant, I will need to abort the unborn pups.
Now before you all start going nuts on me ... of course I would NEVER do such a thing. But people who are pro abortion also tend to be animal rights activists and this seems to be the only way to get them to understand.
2007-07-30 00:40:05 · answer #5 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because they are already 30 thousand in Dept
and the white house wants to collect.
2007-07-30 20:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by Don A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because you're murdering an innocent human being...and we all have the right to LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The other part of your question isn't even worth entertaining.
2007-07-30 00:41:39 · answer #7 · answered by AmericanPatriot 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because abortions actually occur.
2007-07-30 00:39:36 · answer #8 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Ohhh. One of those Bush bashing questions. Thanks for the points.
2007-07-30 00:52:36 · answer #9 · answered by John himself 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋