MJ...he is the clutch player who has made "the big shot" over and over through out his career, especially in the playoffs......Kobe is a great player but hasn't been able to become this type of clutch player yet...there is really only one choice....MJ
2007-07-29 16:17:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ocho Cinco 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
1
2016-12-22 23:45:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you seen Kobe made any guaranteed last second shots? I've seen Jordan done it few times at least. I'd say Jordan is a better bet for sure. With both at their prime time, I'd say Jordan is definitely much more experienced and have better shots. No doubt I will pass the ball to Kobe because opposition manager, coaches and all players will be thinking the same thing that the ball will go to Jordan and will be doubling him for sure. Hence, Kobe has a better chance of scoring for this situation.
2007-07-29 17:40:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Beach bum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Discover now the best sport betting system: http://sport-betting-tips.checkhere.info
Too many people think of sports betting as just something they do in their past time. However, many people can see the potential that exists if you manage to have the right sports betting strategy and correct approach to betting in general. Are you sick of losing? Interested in finding out how to turn your luck around? Do you want to know which sports betting strategies stand to help you make the most from your betting?
Any good strategy should allow you to place bets based on a systematic method. Of course there is always a random element or so called luck involved, but betting is all about stacking the odds in your favor. There should be no guess work involved or bets placed based on gut feelings. Betting is a business and it should be treated like one. Any money you use for betting needs to be separate from money you use for your daily life or anything else. How can you possibly expect to follow a strategy with money that was originally set aside to pay next week's rent with? You can't. This will help you to focus on the task of betting and remove any emotional strings attached to the money.
So what makes a good strategy or what should you look for in a strategy before you decide to implement it? Any good strategy needs to have a positive expectancy. This means that in the long run you will win. The hit rate of the strategy needs to be above 50% for you to be able to profit in the long run. An ideal win rate should be between 60 to 70%, because you will need to cover the fees and other expensive associated with betting. Is it feasible to expect you'll be able to find a system that has a 100% win rate? No, it isn't. The best you can do is find a system that has a positive expectancy and stick with it. In the long run you will make more money than you can possibly lose.
Keep whatever information and news you have about the teams as up to date as possible. Any changes in the teams makeup or factors that affect how the players play will great affect the potential outcome of a match. Make sure that you are constantly up to date on every aspect that affects the potential outcome of a match. Information is the key to winning at sports betting.
2014-10-22 16:02:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
phil jackson might want the ball to go to michael jordan, and make kobe bryant the second option. this would make kobe mad and he will try to force the defense to michael, get as wide open as he can, and even if they're down by 1 he will shoot the 3 to make him look like the hero in the end. he might even try to convince the inbounds passer to give him the ball before the play starts. but if he misses the team and all the fans will be very pissed off at him. if you want a good ending then i think mj will make the clutch shot like he usually does, and everyone will be happy they won the championship, but kobe will be a little pissed that he didn't get the ball.
2007-07-29 18:17:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by sm30 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jordan
2016-03-16 02:22:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First I doubt those two would be down by 1, but if they were you give the ball to Jordan. Why? Because he has proven repeatedly that he can make the right decision in the clutch. Which means if he has a good shot he takes it, if someone else has a better shot he passes. It's pretty much that simple.
2007-07-29 16:43:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigdaddy33 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
all respect to MJ, i'm going kobe. he a lil quicker than jordan so i think he can break the defense down quick in 3 seconds and get a open shot and kobe has hit alot of game winners already and he not even 30 yet....it seem like any game the lakers are behind 3 or under with little time left, kobe gonna hit the winner, every time. EXAMPLE, the usa scrimmage game the other day!
2007-07-29 16:52:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by lil_taul 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Since Phil Jackson said kobe is a better player then Jordan......So did Steve Kerr....draw up a play for Kobe and get the hell outta his way!..if he get's triple teamed he can always kick it out to MJ for three!..Oh!..wait..MJ cant shoot beyond 24 feet!...where's steve Kerr?????..
Hey King remember this??.......In 86' with Jordan's team facing elimination ....game 3 vs the Celtics Jordan scored 2 points in the second half at HOME!...in the game prior he missed a open shot that could have won the game...He choked twice in a row!!!....lol.....even when MJ scored 63 points...Larry Bird said "That was God Disguised as Michael Jordan"....so basically what he said was...Even on MJ's best day!!....he is a LOSER!!!!...no wait ...a Ballhogging LOSER!!.....jacks up 63 points and still loses!!!!......
MJ = Overrated!
2007-07-30 07:38:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Alpha Wolf(Bringer of Rain) 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Jordan. Because with little time left Jordan have a more quicker step than Kobe that I know for a fact.
2007-07-29 16:22:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Darth Revan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can't imagine them being in a close game playing together. Just for your question, I'll say Jordan should take the last shot.
2007-07-30 04:40:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by 40 hightower 4
·
0⤊
0⤋