The division was a good one. because had it not been done then there will be many Pakistan in India wherever the Muslims are in majority like what is happening in Kashmir and in Malappuram in Kerala where Muslims wanted a separate district for them since they were in majority in that area. Muslims are normally intolerant and all politicians especially Hindu politicians use them for their political reasons acting as if they are pro Muslims.
2007-07-29 16:05:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by rajan l 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is a long list of peoples who have been killed for following a particular religion. Muslims were also killed by Hindus. It wasn't a one-way street.
2007-07-29 14:12:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
first of all i could opt to declare it is the British Empire's fault for springing up the type of branch, simply by fact the question states previous to 1947 Hindu's and Muslims all lived in a single us of a, whilst India have been scuffling with for Independence many atrocities have been inflicted upon the two races. finally after one hundred years India have been unfastened, and muslims took earnings of the situation to combat for his or her very own us of a now effortless as Pakistan, considering that that day Pakistan has terrorised India desiring Kashmir and scuffling with for what isn't theirs. Even before the partition Hindu's and Sikh's have suffered plenty on the hands of Muslims, being compelled into Islam!! the place do you think of Bangladesh got here from!!!! i think of the British Governement could shop their noses out of what doesnt concern them!! possibly the Queen could supply the jewels back which she stole from the homes in India which she wears on her head!!! Britain could shop properly faraway from this rely and recommendations their very own organization.
2016-10-13 01:45:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Partition was the result of the Imperialistic Policy of "Divide and Rule" whose seeds were sown way back ;around 1910 or so .
It wasn't related to Independence as such so I don't think there is any such need for an "Apology" .
2007-07-29 21:25:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only generals in Pakistan should apologise to all Pakistanis. They should accept civilian supremacy in running the nation. Once it is done Pakistanis will volunteer to join UNDIVIDED INDIA --AKHAND BHARAT.
2007-07-29 20:16:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that`s ur view 4 apology then no one is innocent, Tell the name of any country who never involved in any of unhuman kind of work.
2007-07-29 15:33:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by HEMANT K 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
You son of Bxxx Bo i shall put u back in ur mothers Cxxx
U SOn of *****
2007-07-31 04:12:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are sooo damn stupid!
You have asked a similar question before.
You seem like a Hindu fundamentalist.
MUSLIMS WERE KILLED.
HINDUS WERE KILLED.
SIKHS WERE KILLED.
CHRISTIANS WERE KILLED.
PARSI'S WERE KILLED.
THEY WERE ALL KILLED. NOT JUST PEOPLE FROM 1 PARTICULAR RELIGION.
AND NO, THEY SHOULD NOT APOLOGIES. THEY SHOULD ALL PUT THEIR 2 FINGERS UP AT YOU!
2007-07-31 00:23:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bo 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
there is no need to apolgise
2007-07-29 14:18:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋