You make some excellent points, but don't expect many of the neo-cons to listen to you! They seem to have a vested interest in maintaining willful ignorance! *sm*
2007-07-29 13:22:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by LadyZania 7
·
5⤊
8⤋
If martial law were the goal, when is this conspiracy supposed to be implemented? It is now year 7 of only 8 years for the neo-con in chief. Wouldn't 9/11/01 have been a more suitable date to impose martial law? Who would have opposed it? If the neo-cons hatched 9/11, why weren't they poised to pounce when their plan succeeded? Why wait until the Demagogues are in control of Congress ( and the military budget) to make their move?
Why do your conspiracy theories contain the logic of a slow-witted child?
Oh, yeah, you're a liberal, ignore the last question...
2007-07-29 13:31:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tommy B 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
The first step toward martial law in any society is disarming the population. Hitler said it, Stalin said and the Democrat Congress started saying it in 1968. They still want it. Ask Feinstein or any other freedom loving liberal in the Congress. They are afraid of an armed populous because an armed populous has sufficient power to remove them by force if necessary.
I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said, "An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject". I have added, "A disarmed man is a prisoner".
It is coming boys and girls, just keep supporting the idea that trading freedoms for the promise of security is a good idea. Ben Franklin said, "One who trades their freedom for the promise of security deserves neither".
EDIT: In reference to Truth's answer. Albert Herlong, Jr. was a Democrat. Need I say more? I no longer think your party is asleep, I now am convinced they are comatose. How does it feel to live your live on autopilot with some lib providing all the inputs for you because you aren't smart enough to think for yourself?
2007-07-29 13:41:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
expensive ChiGirl, for the time of his marketing campaign, Obama introduced that he needed to chop back the form of nuclear weapons interior the US. he's interior the recommendations-set of installation the potential by potential of which to electrify suggested alleviation. And whilst Obama introduced that he will strengthen taxes (Donald Trump warns: "taxes would be raised very extensively for dissimilar human beings, and various human beings turning out to be jobs.") and take over each thing interior the yankee device (so as that he can choose who succeeds and who fails), in the present day it replaced into got here upon that Obama has recommended Russia that he intends to get rid of the eastern Europe missile protection device. What a vogue to create a melancholy and kill any risk of america and its inhabitants having any way — in any know — of protecting themselves. nonetheless think of Obama isn't out to injury the rustic? nonetheless think of he's naïve and would not know what he's doing? to those that voted for him and whose brains have all started to function back the respond to the two questions could be a sturdy "NO!" the rest human beings have already seen him for what he's.
2016-10-09 12:57:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's used by all.
2007-07-29 13:19:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by bobanalyst 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Run you little panty waste. They will be coming for you. You can't hide, not even in your momma's basement. No one can help you. The first thing they will do to you is make you get a job. Quick, hide.
2007-07-29 13:27:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by trf6x6 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
if I was you I'd run because I bet after they see this they will be comming for you.
2007-07-29 13:21:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by EviL 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
You are still free. If Bush were a dictator, you would be in prison or a mental ward.
2007-07-29 13:27:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
And you have the moronic left saying everything is ok with their heads in the sand......nice try but you have lost NO Constitutional rights....
2007-07-29 13:21:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by consrgreat 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
Nothing you said is remotely true
2007-07-29 13:30:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Greg 7
·
4⤊
1⤋