There's more carcinogens found in weed smoke than tobacco. It also tars your lungs a lot quicker since there is no method of filtration.
2007-07-29 11:58:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Glen B 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Surely there is a link between inhaling any concentrated smoke, and lung cancer...but marijuana has many more apparent effects...and smoking regularly, and in enough quantity to give you cancer, will likely cause you other difficulties first.
2007-07-29 11:59:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by responder 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
how many people do you think you could round up for the mary jane study given that they'd all need to smoke at least six joints a day for 20 years in order to validate the study?
Man ... they'd be so stoned that they'd never get any work done. No work equals no income, at least where I live.
Get a grip, dude.
2007-07-29 11:59:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spock (rhp) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tobbacco has additives from the supplier that gives off lung cancer, if you took tobbacco straight from the field, dried it out and smoked it you wouldnt get lung cancer.
2007-07-29 12:03:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justin M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there probity are , dope puts more tar into your lungs that's indisputable .
but our laws are so upside down it makes you feel like your Alice looking through the mirror..
from a looooooooooooooonnng time pot head
glen i doubt that with all the extra chemicals they put in cigarettes
2007-07-29 12:00:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course there is a link, and there's plenty of research to support that. What rock have you been living under?
2007-07-29 12:02:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by jll1881 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a link it is just hippies refuse to believe the studies because they were all done by the government and big business (you know the MAN) when you go to college you'll learn about the man and how he is trying to bring us all down man
2007-07-29 12:02:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There has been... A joint is basically like smoking seven cigarettes at once.
2007-07-29 12:00:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by HePunksMeNot 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no point in proving marijuana to be carcinogenic. There's no one to sue; it's illegal.
2007-07-29 12:14:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Farthammerjones 5
·
1⤊
0⤋