2007-07-29 11:28:59 · 19 answers · asked by ADRiELLE 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
All 3 guys were supreme competitors but 2 out of the 3 (Magic and Bird) have all tipped their hats to MJ. They respect his game enough to acknowledge he was the best even though he came into the league after them. I would rather have Jordan on my team because he plays at both ends of the court and he's a fierce competitor. He's also a smart player and a very clutch competitor. At the end of games, there is no one I would rather have take the last shot.
2007-08-02 01:57:36 · answer #1 · answered by JR 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take three of them, imagine Magic at the point, MJ at 2 and Bird at 3 add Kareem at 4/5, boy you've got yourself an unbeatable team right here. You didn't say i couldn't pick all of them, but if you did say that i would take MJ.
MJ is a great all around player, that is why he's called the all time greatest player in the game.
Magic he is big and can pass but that's about it.
Bird is also like Magic, only he can't pass like Magic.
2007-07-29 11:35:53 · answer #2 · answered by extreme_baller25 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Magic hands down.
the 2 most important positions in basketball are the point guard and the center spot. and what do you know, magic can run both those spots w/ ease. dynamic scorers like jordan and bird can be found anyday. granted, they arent in the same league as jordan and bird and can't fill it up w/ the relative ease at which both of them do it, but theres always gonna be someone who can fill it up.
besides, magic is a natural born leader. taking over the injured kareem to play all 5 positions as a rookie was completely unprecedented and has yet to be accomplished by another player since. magic is an underrated scorer only because his passing was so great. he also has a killer instinct to take over the game when needed (ask boston and larry bird). a player w/ such great decision making, versatility, and leadership is invaluable to any team
2007-07-29 12:30:59 · answer #3 · answered by ballerritehurr32 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Magic Johnson
2007-07-29 11:33:22 · answer #4 · answered by OJ Mayo the Warriors fan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you pick any of the three, you wouldn't lose, but it's a tie between Larry and Magic, who could hurt you in ways other than scoring.Jordan was a great player, but usually, had to have the ball in his hands to do something special.
2007-07-29 13:08:35 · answer #5 · answered by zebbie g 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Micheal Jordan, would not even consider the others. MJ, was a lader, a team plaayer, an acrobat, and in a legue of his own. Magic was great and so was Bird, but Micheal could do it all, and do it all the time, and do it year after year.
2007-07-29 11:39:52 · answer #6 · answered by edjdonnell 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would take MJ. Magic and Bird were top notch. But MJ has some of both in him which I believe made him better than them.
2007-07-29 11:32:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Magic, then Larry, then MJ.
Why do you think Jordan never won until the end of the 80s?
2007-07-29 23:24:27 · answer #8 · answered by G K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jordan. Magic and Bird were special, but Jordan was a cut above them. No doubt. He was so strong-willed that he demanded 100% effort from his teammates all the time. Guys like that in this lackadaisical world are very very rare.
2007-07-29 11:32:53 · answer #9 · answered by lmnop 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Larry Bird of course. i want my team to win immediately. can't afford to wait 8 long years, man!
2007-07-29 17:57:31 · answer #10 · answered by schnooks17 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋