English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-29 10:43:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

tommy well said,,I take it as a no ,to the planed finish in Iraq.

2007-07-29 10:57:33 · update #1

11 answers

Oh yeah. Make sure a Democrat wins in 08 so they don't have to worry about it.

2007-07-29 10:55:27 · answer #1 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 1 1

I think the ace in the hole will be the "surprise" find of huge stocks of WMD's.

The interesting part of the WMD story is that a lot of soldiers, especially pilots in the air force, believe Saddam hid a massive stockpile of weapons, probably removing them to Syria so they couldn't be captured.

Consider this: did it seem strange to you that, practically the first thing Nancy Pelosi did in her new position as Speaker of the House was race over to Syria as fast as she could?

Here is my theory. Our government has been negotiating in private with Syria to locate and recover these weapons. Pelosi knows that the discovery of these weapons will devastate any chance the Democrats have of retaking the White House in the next election. Her real purpose in going there was to make some counter offer to the Syrians. She doesn't want the weapons to ever be found again.

The Arab League finally visited Israel last week. I think a huge new peace initiative is in the works. Syria will start cooperating with the U.S., the weapons will be discovered, and the Republicans will have a lock on the White House for '08.

2007-07-29 17:57:32 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 0

Do you think the neo-coms have an ace in the hole for a defeat in Iraq?

2007-07-29 18:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by - 6 · 0 1

As long as the nation of Iraq remains a democracy and the people of Iraq remain free, there is no failure - rather libs admit that fact or, not.

2007-07-30 00:40:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do you even know what a neo-con is?
Calling conservatives, "Neo-cons" is like calling you pinkos, "centrists." Don't make us less extremists than we are!
I am a Conservative, not a JFK Democrat-turned Republican (a.k.a. Neo-Con)
The people you think you are insulting with your neo-con label are more right-wing than you give them credit for.
You won't stop, though, because, "Conservative" doesn't sound sinister, does it?
We true Conservatives will continue to scoff at your ignorance.

2007-07-29 17:52:58 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy B 6 · 2 0

Do you think Liberals will ever refer to anyone that doesn't agree with them as something other then a Neo-Con, which most of them don't actually know the definition of?

2007-07-29 17:49:36 · answer #6 · answered by TJ815 4 · 1 0

Yes, their ace in the hole is they won't get elected in 2008 so it will be someone else's problem.

That what the republican evil clowns are best at.
Stir up a huge hornets nest and just when it's at it's worst they paint this huge yellow stripe down their back and run, run ,run.

2007-07-29 17:51:34 · answer #7 · answered by Chad 2 · 0 1

There is no planned route to success, only those of us who see a need to secure victory through effort and disciplined movement toward success! Regardless of the Spineless Liberals attempts to create anarchy and defeat!!!!

2007-07-29 18:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They don't need to. The Iraq people are killing each other so nicely. Just keep giving them weapons and ammo and let them go at it. Really cuts down on the problems we may have later. Better the muslims kill each other than us having to fight them.

2007-07-29 17:47:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes, churchill said it best when he said , to equate the cost of war is to be defeated.
WE MUST FOCUS ON WINNING!!!
Thats what neocons do, focus danielson, focus.

2007-07-29 17:51:44 · answer #10 · answered by NEOBillyfree 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers