I am going to vote for the woman, if she cant get the job done than who can. The republicans got this country so freaking messed up. Its not even funny any more.
2007-07-29 10:58:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by its_me_tink292 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
We judge by the person, not by skin color or genitalia.
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
Let's elect obama and we'll be forced to pray 5 times a day on a mat with our butts in the air.
2007-07-29 18:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by infobrokernate 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nowhere, but then facts have never been the democrapic parties strong point. You see no one mentions that Hitlary shouldn't be elected because she's a woman.
As a matter of fact every time one of you folk ask this asinine question it's pointed out that she's a socialist who sold out a long time ago and will bring this country to a standstill.
And Obama doesn't have enough political experience to even debate properly. Unlike racist idiots like Sharpton will claim it's a matter of experience that he lacks not the color of his skin.
Why don't you run along and quit adding to the idiocy on these boards by asking inane and pedantic questions.
2007-07-29 18:20:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Everybody's been mad because we vote for the typical white male candidate, and nobody gets mad when we vote for the atypical black woman candidate--just because she's not your typical run-of-the-mill candidate. We should be just as worried about "discrimination" for both extremes.
It's time to take MLK, Jr.'s words into effect and seriously judge candidates on the content of their heart and their convictions. If neither Hillary nor Obama are the best candidates, as based on their political viewpoints, then I'm not going to vote for them! It's as simple as that!
2007-07-29 17:58:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
How is that possible? We haven't even had the election yet. There has never been (until now) possible female or minority candidates that actually had all the qualifications of a serious nominee. And even now that is questionable.
2007-07-29 19:10:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are more folks supporting candidates for those reasons than against.
Most of the folks against Clinton and Obama oppose them because of their socialist values.
2007-07-29 17:29:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nobody is saying don't elect Obama because he's black. They're saying he's "naive", at least those are Hillary's words.
Nobody is saying don't elect Hillary because she's a woman. They're saying she's so liberal she has to invent a new word for it, and she can't be trusted.
2007-07-29 17:27:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by open4one 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
I'd vote for Condi Rice in a heartbeat.
2007-07-29 17:56:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by FOA 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Very interesting, how many people prefer a woman or black president over one who is competent and agrees with their views, but happens to be white or male.
I'll go by who is on my side, not by their sex or appearance.
2007-07-29 17:33:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
EEWW! Mental picture of a bunch of pantsless politicians searing my corneas!
Thanks alot!
2007-07-29 17:28:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Merissa F 3
·
0⤊
1⤋