English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All of those children who died in Waco Texas when her husband was President?
After all, the whole reason behind invading the compound was to SAVE the children but instead they died a miserable death at the hands of National Defense.
Has she ever come forward and discussed that issue and how something like that will never happen if she herself becomes President?
I think this is important since when her husband was in office they terrorized a group of people,killed them along with their children and got away with it here on American soil.
And I want to know,has SHE ever discussed that incident and expressed any remorse over it?

2007-07-29 08:29:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Those people wouldn't let their children leave because members of the military were mooning them and flipping them off and screaming obscenities at them.
There were women pulling up their shirts and flashing members at the commune.
Would you send your children out to people like that who are acting like crazed perverts?
I saw live footage of them doing that and the members were saying that they wanted to send their children out but were afraid to because they didn't know what would happen to them.

2007-07-29 08:37:52 · update #1

Magi 2000
That is not true.
The residents did not burn the place down themselves.
The military were seen and filmed blowing the place up and running people over with tanks as they were fleeing for their lives.
The media will report anything that is in their best interest and obviously they thought reporting a lie was better than reporting the truth.
Those people were torched.
Watch "Rules of Engagement at Waco Texas" and then tell me what you think.

2007-07-29 08:42:20 · update #2

Whether it was her fault or not I think she should have at least expressed her condolences over what happened.
Because what happened could have easily been avoided by doing the right thing instead of doing what's wrong.
Not only were those children burned but they were gassed with a chemical which causes muscles to contract breaking every bone and it's an extremely painful way to die.
That should never be forgotten no matter how long ago it occurred especially since the wife of the President in charge at the time is now wanting to be President herself.

2007-07-29 08:48:06 · update #3

19 answers

To the best of my knowledge, I never saw her or her husband apologize for anything. and you are correct. I saw the films about waco too and it showed just what you said, it was OUR ppl that lit that fire. Those films went all over the country and around the world, many of us saw them, tho surely they werent ever talked about on the news. Media running things still? YEP. I rest my case. Even in the OK bombing, there were ppl there that knew Clinton, films went around on those too, that were mindboggling. Open your eyes america. How come htis stuff is not on news/???? just wondering outloud.

2007-07-29 14:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by full gospel shirley 6 · 0 0

you people saying the question asker is a wacky conservative is just as bad as the question asker herself.

Let's put this into perspective.
These are the known facts:
-David Koresh and the Branch Dividians were extremists and swore they would not be taken alive.
-Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with what happened in Waco Texas. (and no I am not a democrat)
-The question asker is a conspiracy theorist bent on blaming the government for everything that goes wrong in the world.
-Some of the question answerers are the same way.
-If people inside the compound were in their right minds, they would have realized that the entire world was watching from outside and their children would have been cared for. They were just as much to blame for the children's deaths.

I don't believe the fire was started intentionally, either from inside or outside. I believe that what happened was a series of tragic mistakes by both the ATF and the Dividians inside the house. Why must you and others make more out of things than what's really there. These were extremists who were breaking the law. When the government tried to act on it, they made a series of mistakes in the process. Nothing more, nothing less.

Besides, judging by all of the additions the question asker has added to her question, she will not be convinced about anything that differs from what she already believes.

The simple answer to your tyrade is, yes, I believe she did express her remorse for the innocent children that died that day. I can't present evidence to the fact, but can't imagine her not doing so. Get over it. You don't like her, fine, don't vote for her. I won't vote for her, but it has nothing at all to do with this.

2007-07-29 16:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by holdemfoldem911 3 · 1 0

I'm not sure if she has recently expressed sympathy for what happened in Waco; however, I don't believe she should apologize for what happened as she was not in office nor was responsible for what happened.

As for whether or not she expressed remorse at the time, I honestly don't remember if she did or not because it's been such a long time since that happened.

2007-07-29 16:02:25 · answer #3 · answered by quitcherbitchn 2 · 0 0

I remember the liberal outrage over national guard troops on campuses in the 70's..and when the Chinese ran over protesters in Tienanmen Square..

but a group of Christians that were invaded by jack-boot gestapo thugs sent from the Clinton Oval Office..then weeks later burned to death by flame throwing military vehicles..

if it was Bush threatening the idea..like via the Patriot act..we get indignant repudiation..from crybaby enablers of a racketeer impeached thug that they give undying allegiance to..

2007-07-29 15:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Your question is mute. Hillary was not president nor did she hold any political office. She was like the rest of us a sadden American. I know Hillary was deeply troubled by the events in Waco she loves her country weather you agree with her politically or not. P.S. Walk a mile in Janet Reno's shoes I know she had publicly said that Waco will torment her for the rest of her life. Can you say you would not have made the same wrong decision with the faulty info she had.

2007-07-29 15:40:12 · answer #5 · answered by kikers 2 · 2 1

Uh, that's not quite what happened at Waco.
The people there where mis-guided extremeists, and they swore that they would not be taken alive.

The residents of the compound are the ones who burned the place down.

2007-07-29 15:38:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

if she showed any remorse that would indicate she was wrong, after all she is the one who gave the order , hell Bill was to busy trying to make out with a intern, he didn't have time for such stupid things, I would rather ask if she had any remorse for killing the guy she had burning documents for her, and left him in the park,

2007-07-29 16:19:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that Hillary can only empathize with how badly she's getting screwed, or how badly she's being treated. It's all about her - all the time. Expecting her to have genuine feelings of any sort for anyone else is asking way too much of her.

2007-07-29 15:39:58 · answer #8 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 1

Most of the smart people let their kids leave. All the people that died in Wacko um I mean Waco were just more proof of survival of the fittest.

We should all be thankful that the heavily armed crazies parrished so we don't have to deal with them blowing up our daycare centers.

2007-07-29 15:33:01 · answer #9 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 3 3

she hasn't discussed it, she won't discuss it and no one will make her. the Clinton's are the darlings of the Democratic party and as such are immune to such scrutiny. you have to have a heart to express remorse.

2007-07-29 15:41:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers