Were eight years under Reagan worse than eight years under Bush 2, or is it the other way around?

Question

Domestically I'd say Reagan. Internationally, I'd call it a tie. What say you?

Sock Puppet (below) Clever Avatar. I like it...

Answer 1

Ecomomically we are doing a bit better with Bush. Internationally, I have to say Bush is much worse.

Answer 2

i can't quite talk to the impact of President Obama's administration yet, it quite is somewhat too quickly to make any quite considerate, balanced, reasoned judgements (exterior of returning to multi-lateralism). i visit declare that, you are able to desire to checklist the Bush administration's disasters for hours and then warfare to p.c.. the worst. There are in simple terms a good number of and that they are in simple terms abominable. the present day problem with Obama seems to around a touch too plenty accessibility to the media. the place Bush the Illiterate replaced into properly saved as far flung from the media as obtainable, Obama is giving them too plenty time. This makes me contemplate whether he's getting slowed down in micro-administration. whilst he's managing such trifles by using fact the full gates subject, i'm thinking particularly distance would desire to be a sturdy factor. On a factor word, i might in simple terms desire to ask if any of the real looking human beings right here (the few of of you) have observed that the birther bullshit has dried up now that the drooling puppies have a clean chew toy interior the gates factor? it quite is exciting to video show the unevolved, from an anthropological point of view.

Answer 3

I would take 8 years of Reagan any day. A growing economy, manufacturing still done in America, no right wing propaganda machine holding the media hostage, freedom to criticize the president without being called an America hater. It was paradise compared to what we have now

Answer 4

Reagan ending the cold war and Bush Chaney gang destroys the balance of Middle East for oil and starting a never ending war (anybody know how to end his mess in Iraq please speak out, I am not talking about pulling out Iraq or not). I can not thinking of any president before or future can ever worse than Bush.

Answer 5

As I see it, NIXON,REAGAN ,BUSH#1and BUSH#2 are all just one big gang! The same criminals served in all the admin. ! Why else would Kissinger even be allowed in the White House every day to "advise" the President? We now know that our suspicions were right about how much power Kissinger had in the Nixon admin. He should've been prosecuted for the war crimes he authorized in Cambodia and Laos ! Now he's directing the "Decider" in the never-ending war on [terror?] We've been on the road to Fascism since J.F.K. was MURDERED in Dallas !

Answer 6

Eight years of Nancy and Ronnie as they tried make it as if there were no problems everything is just fine. Ronnie was acting his part as president while Nancy was the director.

Bush years of one and two have done little to further the progress of this country.

Answer 7

I see that Mr. negative on everything is back. Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush are both good men and good presidents. Carter and Clinton, by comparison, were bad for the country.

Answer 8

I remember thinking Reagan and his people had Republicans fooled, running up a huge deficit, and growing a larger government while saying he wasn't. But GW has him beat. Reagan's adminsistration even complains about Bush.

Answer 9

Bush2 wins. He has done more to damage American credibility abroad and security and tranquility at home than the Gipper could even dream of.

Answer 10

Hard call... both were infinitely better than the 4 Carter years...