2007-07-29 07:12:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yuck! That is no choice.
2007-07-29 07:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think both would do a good job, but I have to favor Giuliani for a few reasons. First, Giuliani has a record of cutting taxes while Bloomberg raised taxes then lowered them somewhat. Second, both are competent, but Giuliani has a better record when it comes to dealing with harsh situations like fighting crime. Giuliani is a man of action while Bloomberg is a better manager.
I guess the best situation would be for Giuliani to fix the problems and then have Bloomberg take over and manage the nation.
2007-07-29 14:16:44 · answer #2 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bloomberg. Not that I'm a fan of billionaires, but he probably understands the world at that level better than many others.
2007-07-29 14:16:51 · answer #3 · answered by bullwinkle 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bloomberg, hands down.
2007-07-29 14:17:10 · answer #4 · answered by Mkath 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bloomberg, he is a better mayor too.
2007-07-29 14:15:42 · answer #5 · answered by hansblix222 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guliani is more corrupt that Cheney-Bush, and has more mob ties than Michael Corleone.
BTW, it's spelled, "Blomberg".
2007-07-29 14:24:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm 4 Rudy!
2007-07-29 14:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of the above
Although better either than Hilary
2007-07-29 14:15:14 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle John 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Anybody but Rudy!!!
2007-07-29 14:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, I've got a crush on Obama
2007-07-29 14:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋