English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

... by the world.

We should thank our lucky stars that the world "liked" Clinton. Right?

Otherwise he might have gotten 30 million or so Americans killed. Right?

2007-07-29 06:52:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

i agree with your philosophy but the problem is clinton did alot more damage than just 911. liberal whackos like pelosi are now convinced character has less meaning, and the american people will believe virtually anything if so lead. the sad and sick part of the whole clinton affair is most liberals can look at the clinton legacy and give you diatribe, something to the effect of boys will be boys, ignoring the facts and reprocussions.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-07-29 06:57:02 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 8

I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. The fact is that 911 was carried out during the ninth month of the Bush administration. By this time the Bush administration was fully in place and should have been responsible. The fact that Bush had been on vacation for a significant amount of time and ignored the warnings of his own intelligence underscores the fact that the Bush administration is responsible for the biggest security breach in our nation's history.

2007-07-29 14:00:14 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 3 1

9-11 was planned and executed by the right-wing neocon movement.

9-11 Mysteries
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003

National security had been shut down as is evidenced by Norman Mineta's testimony at the 9-11 hearings.

MR. MINETA: I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_2003-05-23.htm

Those orders by Dick Cheney could only have been to NOT shoot down the plane.

2007-07-29 14:00:27 · answer #3 · answered by Trevor S 4 · 0 1

wrong....and Clinton was not liked by the way. Terrorist killed quite a few Americans under Clinton's watch. You may want to expand your research a bit.

2007-07-29 13:59:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Where the hell did you come up with 30 million as a number of people killed?

And why does it matter? If a democrat is elected in 08, and a terrorist attack happens the year afterwards, it wont matter that it was planned during Bush's regime, will it? NO.

2007-07-29 14:00:25 · answer #5 · answered by kt_b_blue 3 · 1 1

Who was president when the 1993 bombing of the WTC was planned? I'll give you a hint. Since it took place only a month into Clinton's presidency the plan had to be hatched under the previous administration.

2007-07-29 13:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

By similar reasoning as yours, the United States is now located at the South Pole. But wait... that doesn't make any sense.

The first bombing attacks on the WTC were DURING the Clinton Administration. Your "logic" loses here.

2007-07-29 13:56:39 · answer #7 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 1 1

Not only is what you're saying not true, but it shows that you know how to make a fool out of yourself. First of all, Isaac Newton, 911 has been around for a long time. Second of all, your reasoning is as illogical as a disorganized schizophrenic. You need to go back to Social Studies class, possibly in the first grade.

2007-07-29 13:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

What a strange question. You are trying to make it a negative that Osama bin Laden may not have liked Bill Clinton. How strange of you...

2007-07-29 14:48:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm sorry, but which President funded Iraq, Iran and bin Laden? Go back a decade.

How do people come up with this bs??

2007-07-29 14:03:47 · answer #10 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 0 0

YOU'RE RIGHT! But your question is deceptive; there is no hard evidence yet that links him to the Neo-Conservative group PNAC (Project for the New American Century) that started in the late 80s early 90s.

2007-07-29 14:00:18 · answer #11 · answered by Sangria 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers