Hi,
I'd agree. Most reporters are socially liberal. This is a fantastically controversial topic in news rooms.
Here's a pretty good, recently-written article on this topic: http://www.minnesotamonitor.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1969
I think journalists are generally liberal because their background and training lend themselves to a liberal point of view. The great majority of reporters earn far less than their friends and neighbors, immediately giving them a bottoms-up perspective. I imagine that reporters often side with society's most fragile and poverty-stricken members, because they understand what it's like living paycheck to paycheck.
Reporting is largely a public service, and I've long thought that reporters and social activists are merely two sides of the same zebra. Although American reporters strive to be neutral -- I mean, really, really, really strive to be neutral -- their liberal bias will invariably escape and pollute their reporting.
I am a reporter. I work with reporters. I know what I'm talking about. I'm not biased, of course -- but all the other reporters are. *wink
Cheers,
Sensational Luke
2007-07-30 13:13:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sensational Luke 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the media should make an attempt to be fair and unbiased, however there is much abuse of freedom of the press.
Rhetoric is not news, it is opinion.
It would benefit the nation if all reported only factually, without spin.
As far as politics goes, it is ridiculous that a candidate with the most money usually wins.
They need to "level" the playing field and give equal airtime to all candidates, especially in the Presidential campaign.
We have probably missed out on several potentially good presidents, simply because they could not "buy good press" and campaign ads.
2007-07-29 06:41:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by JustSaySo 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are far fewer opportunities to slant the news than you might think.
A great many stories are merely facts. Congress passed a bill doing this. The President today said this in a speech. Gas prices reached a certain price. Two helicopters crashed in Arizona. Whatever. And most of the Associated Press stories are bland, but you could hardly call them biased.
Commentators and analysts often come with a certain bias, but usually they are well identified on the air. Just don't confuse their reports with a basic news story.
2007-07-29 15:31:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by wdx2bb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should do yourself a favour and turn off the TV.
American media has gotten so dumbed down in the past 10 years that you can't accurately apply liberal/conservative tags to any of it.
Try watching BBC, it's a little duller, but much more informative.
2007-07-29 06:47:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both ignore the following
Truth, Justice, and the
American Way!
Vote Libertarian!
Kelley Ross !!! !
http://www.friesian.com/ross/ca40/
AND
Fully Informed Jury Association
http://www.fija.org/
2007-07-29 06:39:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by American Dissenter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 1st step in any stable rip-off is to persuade the mark that each and every physique else is mendacity to them. as quickly as you're confident that each and all the media - yet Fox information - is liberal, then you definitely've bought off on the tale. savour the classified ads.
2016-11-10 11:18:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋