to interrupt
2007-07-29 05:50:06 · 10 answers · asked by inquisitor 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes.
While not all will like his appearance at the floods, many of those working to help, as well as those affected by the floods will appreciate him turning up.
So yes, Prince Charles was "right to interrupt the rescue services at work."
2007-08-02 04:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by The Patriot 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How long did he "interrupt " it for?
By visiting the flooded areas he's showing that he actually GIVES a damn about what happens to the people of this country. If he didn't visit at all he's be accused of not caring.
Don't like the Monarchy? Then why live here?! There are plenty of countries like America where you can live under a "truly democratically elected" leader.
Like Bush (ROFLMAO!)
BTW Where are the politicians when this terrible thing is happening to British people? Oh yes thats right theyre all sunning themselves on holiday! Including Mr Backhander himself, Blair and his ghastly wife . . .
2007-07-29 06:02:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
These people are between a rock and a hard place. If they do not show up they are accused of not caring. if they do show up they can delay the work. On balance in spite of what I have said before, I think these short visits raise the morale of people working their backsides off, just as long as they do not make promises they can not deliver because that ruins morale. Remember Blair and his promises to the forces.
2007-07-29 10:26:56 · answer #3 · answered by Scouse 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Interrupt rescue services? NO!
Just being there? YES!
Did he offer to help?
2007-07-29 05:58:42 · answer #4 · answered by oldsalt 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
These people werent fighting for survival.
The Prince's presence highlights the plight of the victims.
Having said that,the transport and security operations are costly,perhaps this money would have been better targetted at flood defences.The same defences that local councils have ignored ,because they blew their budgets on mosques and immigrant support.
2007-07-29 06:03:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It seems as if the poor old numty cant do right for doing wrong
2007-07-29 08:03:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's exactly why Mr. Bush didn't go to New Orleans He said "they have work to do" They give him hell over this
2007-07-30 06:20:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor old Charlie eh!
Cameron gets lambasted for not going and Charlie for going.
Just shows you can't do right for doing wrong!!
2007-07-29 05:54:36 · answer #8 · answered by one shot 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps not but whatever this guy does he seems to be castigated, case of damned if you do, damned if you don't.
2007-07-29 05:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He reminds me of a wet fart.
2007-07-29 06:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋