with some of the greats like aggasi.bron,micheal and....do u think he can win as many grand slam as his consistency of play and aggresivness of winning is shown.............
2007-07-29 05:29:43 · 20 answers · asked by FI 1 in Sports ➔ Tennis
Roger already is the best player of all time according to the greats themselves. McEnroe, Borg, Connors, Sampras, Blake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMwr8UwbvvM&mode=related&search=
Will he go on to win atleast 4 more grandslams to beat Sampras. Absolutely.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAT0LxVUf3s&mode=related&search=
2007-07-29 05:43:59 · answer #1 · answered by terminator 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think he will go down as the best of all time. His style of play and consistency is better than any other player in history. The only thing off about Federer is that his personality has never been marketable. He the only guy on tour who is extremely proper, and shows little emotion. On that note, no wonder he fits in with the Wimbledon crowd so well. It would've been nice to keep some of that anger he had when he was younger. Otherwise, he's fantastic.
2007-07-31 22:04:57 · answer #2 · answered by djb32067433_1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who are Bron and Michael? Federer already has 11 slams to Agassi's 8; 3 Masters Cups to Agassi's 1. The only meaningful things Agassi beats Federer on are number of Masters Series titles (17 to 13; Agassi holds the all time record); 4 AO's to Federer's three and Agassi's one FO title. Fed will ease through the USO this August/Sept, he has no serious rivals on hard courts and Nadal is only punishing himself with his gruelling schedule.
Federer does not need the French to be considered the GOAT (Greatest of all Time); Sampras never won the French; Borg never won the AO or USO so it's not really important. He'll win the FO when Nadal knackers himself out/does himself a serious injury (so pretty soon). Matty D has the right idea. Federer doesn't strain himself so he'll be able to prolong his career.
2007-07-30 19:37:23 · answer #3 · answered by second only to trollalalala 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe he can still go on winning, and stands a great shot at beating Sampras' record for Majors won. The good news for him, though is that, having won 11 Slams, he's already up there with Laver and Borg. Not exactly bad company. Even if he never wins another Slam, he will still be remembered as on of the all-time greats. That said, I'm still sure he'll win more.
2007-07-31 20:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by rammsteinfan-1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck yes
2007-07-29 17:54:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who is Roger Freder? Or any other of the people you mentioned, for that matter.
2007-07-29 13:22:00 · answer #6 · answered by H T 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if he wins the french! (which I doubt, since Rafa is the undisputed King of Clay Vamos Rafa!) (Sorry Roger =[ )
:)
2007-07-30 16:15:07 · answer #7 · answered by Mozzypug 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roger can definitely go on and be the best..He has everything to do it but since I am die-hard Rafa Fan, I believe he will still be deprived of the ELUSIVE French Open Title..
2007-07-29 14:52:40 · answer #8 · answered by NPI 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
absolutely. i think the only player who tops roger is rod laver...but roger still has a few good years left in him to make his marks in the history books.
he's got a few more slams to go....but he'll do it.
2007-07-29 16:03:24 · answer #9 · answered by Vegetable Soup (I'm baaaack) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes because his playing style doesn't use that much effort at all, so he will probably be playing longer than anybody, consequently resulting in more grand slam titles.
2007-07-29 13:20:56 · answer #10 · answered by Matty G 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋