English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

in Iraq? Instead of sending our soliders out there with families, living up to thier civil duties, we took the dangerous of our society who have already decieved us and sent them over there to live up to their civil duties that is owed.

2007-07-29 05:23:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

11 answers

Sounds like a great idea to me - besides, most countries, who have the same type of people, send them here just go rid their country of them.

2007-07-29 05:47:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The men that are making all the bombs and killings in Iraq are just like our murderers, rapists, and extreme criminals. If we can't stop them, how are we so post to stop two groups of them? Two groups that don't mind how many Innocent people get harmed or killed. Would you like to be a person like your self over there that was suddenly raped by a bunch of men, theirs or ours? Or find out you children were shot down for a target practice?
THINK!

2007-07-29 12:37:42 · answer #2 · answered by geessewereabove 7 · 1 0

I think that would do more harm than good. We would probably end up with more terrorists to harm our beloved soldiers. This is honestly a very un-humane way of taking care of the matter, and would violate American Policies. Even if they are criminals, they are entitled to decent treatment.

2007-07-29 20:35:13 · answer #3 · answered by Whitter's 2 · 0 0

What would happen is that they would not only kill the "enemy" but probably also turn on and kill follow soldiers and innocent Iraqi civilians.

Also, most criminal types are very resistant to following orders and don't like discipline. The military demands both.

2007-07-29 12:29:24 · answer #4 · answered by susandiane311 5 · 1 0

Sounds like another script similar to the Dirty Dozen movie.

2007-07-29 12:26:25 · answer #5 · answered by Glen B 6 · 0 0

OMG !!!! That will work! Remember the Brits did that! They ended up with Australia!!!


This is a joke, OK. Love you guys and gals down there.

2007-07-29 12:32:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There have been too many deaths of innocent civilians and too many reports of torture already. That would make a bad situation worse.

2007-07-29 12:51:23 · answer #7 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 0 0

They would most likley side with them! To save there butt

2007-07-29 12:28:09 · answer #8 · answered by singapores 3 · 0 0

better yet send them to Darfur with no weapons

2007-07-29 12:27:29 · answer #9 · answered by Twinkie Thief 7 · 0 0

they would make america look horrible. Terrible Idea...really.

2007-07-29 12:27:40 · answer #10 · answered by Morkoc96 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers