I have seen many different sources or evidence put up other then what you say but what is the sense of arguing with people like you. You and other who believe it was an inside job don't bother to read them and argue the fact to fit your own agenda. Do you believe everything that you read on the Internet, I don't. The Internet use to be a good source of information but not any more. Now it has become an open forum for every crack pot out their who wants to post their own ideas no matter who silly they may be.
Here is a link for you to read.
2007-07-28 21:03:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by evildragon1952 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Notice how people have been conditioned to think that the word "theory" should naturally follow conspiracy!!!!
Now thats herd thinking right there.
The official govt story is a theory because physics laws are laws that do not deviate, they do not change.
Yet the govt tells us the towers came down by pancaking....yet a pancake effect is impossible as it would have taken the towers close to 40 seconds to reach ground level if they had pancaked!!!! The towers took less than 14 seconds to reach ground level. the only way that could have happened is if the 47 steel columns at the core of the building were severed using cutting charges.
The govt wants us to believe that the laws of physics changed on 911, we all know they didnt change, theyll never change. The govt story is the only conspiracy theory there is!!!!
And then there is WTC7 and the fact that Larry Silverstien made billions on his insurance payouts, very very lucky man to have made so much money on a day when so many Americans died. Oh hell yeah and the funny thing is WTC 7 wasnt even hit by a freaking plane??? how lucky can one guy get????
2007-07-29 00:42:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
i cannot really see why 911 should have been a lucky day for silverstein or anybody else on earth.
We all saw two planes slamming into WTC, we all saw the fires, we all saw people jumping out of the windows, we all saw the two towers collapse.
I cannot understand how people trying to pull out some sort of 'evidence' that this is a conspiracy of some sort. Everybody who has a basic understanding of physics would agree that structures like these towers collapse under a fire caused by an impacting plane in the way they collapsed. And about WTC7 well guys i don't know where you think people should have come from trying to prevent it, if half of the firefighters on scene were already buried under the towers.
I think despite this sort of devastation one can just stand there and try to recover from the shock instead of being highly engaged in saving another building on scene which was believed to be destabilized in its postition by the shocks of the impacting towers.
Now we hear about 'controlled demolition' that it was planned, that it pays good for some etc. etc.
Are you nuts ?
This was a planned attack done by people who basically see america as a thread, instead of us seeing others as a thread.
Possibly a terroristic response to some sort of (at least they think so) terroristic acts from the US.
Instead of pulling wild theories about how consiprative your own government plays tricks on you, you should better try to see what we as a nation do on this world .. because WE (and i'm sorry to say) act like stupid.
In fact we always show how cool we are .. this is something someone living in terrible conditions does not really like, cause instead of beeing cool himelf this poor guy has a thousand other worries day by day.
All these 'evidences' about inside stories lead to the point that someone in the government had a plan to press the red panic putton and declare war on a state that was basically defenceless (iraq). This is the same strategy Reagan used Nicaragua for. Its the same concept having people engaged into something, and if you will so .. this is a republican strategy of 'staying in power' and it works great, cause just intelligent enough people figure who pays whom in this.
911 was just a REASON to go for it for less the cost (allies), by simultaniously disabling a good portion of your democratic rights (patriot act e.g.)
what you haven't noticed ?
yeah.. cause you still ask yourself why WTC 7 collapsed.
2007-07-29 01:33:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by blondnirvana 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Ya know I get heartily sick of hearing paper thin arguments defending Bush and the neocons. Theyre always based on other peoples assumptions, and never have any real evidence to back them up....no one but the Truthers are actually researching this stuff, and anything the neocons post can always be countered because their arguments all hinge on 3 main criteria;
1. Keeping America fearful
2.Keeping Americans uninformed
3.Dividing the populace into the left vs right paradigm
(Its an old trick and its called divide and conquer)
Two of their main methodologies are;
Monitoring all Americans electronic communications to
keep an eye out for dissenters and watchdogs.
and controlling the news media...so easy now that the media is now controlled by less than 6 main corporations, all of them accessed and to a large extent contolled by the CIA.
What theyre counting on is everyone staying uninformed, their success at sucking your taxdollars from your neck depends on you thinking its a love bite, rather than the death bite that it really is.
So Im going to post of the relevant links right here....I will also copy and paste them into every other 911 question I see in here. There is no guarantee that youll even check the links out, but Im posting them anyway, for those of you who have more than average intelligence.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586
http://iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-9-11-Controlling-the-Message.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/index.html
http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/Bush/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/schoolvideo.html
http://rense.com/general30/iug.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers_video.html
http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/sk/wt/cp/if/si/
http://documentaries.ws/1/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.567
http://rense.com/general30/iug.htm
http://physics911.net/closerlook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGoEOlQkzMA&mode=related&search=
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers_video.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
http://www.public-action.com/911/robotplane.html
2007-07-29 03:08:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
That link is nothing more than an opinion piece, what good is that to anyone? The families of the 911 victims want a proper investigation not the ommission report (cover up) the white house manufactured last time!! Im sorry you put your trust and faith in opinions, thats just sad.
2007-07-29 06:13:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
countless sources do not necessarily mean reliable or true facts.......i am sure there is much unknown about 911, but i am willing to bet that all the conspiracy theories with their countless sources are not quite as factual as they would like to believe...
if everything we all believe are lies why can you not get the truth out............i am a logical and intelligent person, yet i have not found any conspiracy stuff credible enough to believe........hmmmmmm
2007-07-29 00:40:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Twinkie Thief 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
The disbelievers dont post any links or articles because theyre sheeple.....theyre called that because they cant think for themselves they cant think critically, they cant think logically, they need FOX tv to tell them what to think , they are herd thinkers who have allowed Bush and co to destroy America from the inside out!!! They let that happen because they are idiots, christian fundies, money hungry profiteers, racists, bigots and morons.
2007-07-29 00:38:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because the people who "know it was an inside job" don't know anything about metallurgy (steel can melt), don't know anything about jet fuel (it's kerosene), don't know how different the architecture of the World Trade Center towers were from every other skyscraper in Manhattan, and don't know anything about the Salafist Jihadist movement and its intent to kill anyone who stands in their way. But, what really gets to me is that I lost two people I know on the plane which hit the Pentagon!
2007-07-29 01:22:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by desertviking_00 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
People want to be able to simplify things that disturb them. They want to be able to blame it clearly on one group, or one source.
They tend to automatically disbelieve any evidence that contradicts their simplistic assumptions.
2007-07-29 00:38:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by baltimman 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because the other sourses dispound our facts. Assumptions will make no change, accusations will make people pissed.
2007-07-29 00:38:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by chris 2k 3
·
0⤊
0⤋