that's a little too liberal for me.... I save my liberalness for inside the bedroom (-;
2007-07-30 20:19:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Magic Mouse 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd love it. It'd get the streetwalkers out of the weather.
I've never lived in the tony neighborhoods and I'm nocturnal by nature, so I run into them a lot. They're mostly nice enough girls, so I don't mind chatting with them or letting them bum cigarettes. But, I feel guilty about not having the disposable income to take them out on the dates they keep asking for.
And, it wouldn't hurt if non-working girls were a bit more torward either.
2007-07-29 02:31:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hate
2007-07-29 00:23:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by haha 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
hate it, besides California is the only state in the u.s. to have
two actors run for and win the governorship of the state .
the first one was Ronald Regan (who also ran for and won the
election for president ) and the second one is Arnold Schwarzenegger.(but he can not run for president because he was not born in the u.s.a. )
2007-07-29 13:11:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by atlantismeditation@sbcglobal.net 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hate it Vancouver is such a nice place to live in,, Im broad minded. but not into that
2007-07-29 01:06:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Grand pa 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
... but not as tolerant of drugs? I don't think I'd care too much one way or the other as I don't think it would affect me personally.
2007-07-29 02:52:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Husker41 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd love it. I am a Libertarian.
2007-07-29 03:27:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by auntb93 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
hate it
2007-07-29 00:24:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
sure be good
2007-07-29 00:24:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by JM 6
·
1⤊
1⤋