English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's not as if the sayer is receiving an invoice from the corporation every time that he/she says it, is it?

2007-07-28 16:15:13 · 10 answers · asked by sharifjunaid 3 in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

I meant sending an invoice for payment to the corp.

2007-07-28 16:19:43 · update #1

10 answers

Nah! It's just like "LOL" and other stupid internet shorthand. Inaccurate perhaps, but you know what they mean.

2007-07-28 16:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by ToolManJobber 6 · 0 0

Well I Googled to see if I could find a survey on whether people are annoyed about using the word google for web search, but I didn't find anything.
I'll have to google it again later. :)

English is a living language.That means it changes and evolves all the time. Many of the words you use now and don't give a second thought too were at one time "brand names"

I.E.
AstroTurf, Baggies, Band-Aid, Beer Nuts, Breathalyzer, Brillo Pads, Coke, Dacron, Dumpster, Frisbee, Hi-Liter, Hula-Hoop, Jacuzzi, Jeep, Jell-O, Jockey Shorts, Kitty Litter, Kleenex, Laundromat, Liquid Paper, Magic Marker, Muzak, Novocain, Ping-Pong, Play-Doh, Popsicle, Post-it Note, Q-Tip, Realtor, Rollerblade, Scotch Tape, Scrabble, Seeing Eye (dog), Sheetrock, Slim Jim, Styrofoam, Super glue, Technicolor, Teflon, TelePrompTer, Vaseline, Velcro, Walkman.

2007-07-28 23:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by dropkick 5 · 0 0

No. It is like saying Kleenex when you mean a paper hanky. It is a universally accepted term for that kind of search. I know the difference and I use google for any search description.

And knowing the difference from having tried them all, I use Google as my searcher every time except when I am in Yahoo Answers. The results are better - sorry Yahoo.

2007-07-28 23:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 0 0

Using a brand name as generic may actually be annoying to the trademark owner (who might lose some rights if the practice is allowed), but common:
Jello, Frigidaire, Xerox and a slew of other products have become household generic terms.
Language is what people use, not necessarily what's in the rule books.

2007-07-28 23:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't really get annoyed by it. Google is the most used search engine, and "Google" refers to the website that only consits of the search engine. (Gmail would refer to their e-mail website.) It wouldn't make sense for you to "yahoo" something, because there's many possible meanings for the term. It could mean to e-mail something to a specific person or service, it could mean to send an instant message, or it could mean to look up the answer on "Yahoo! Answers!". Google.com, not including gmail.com, is strictly a search engine. Googling something can not be easily confused for e-mailing or instant messaging like a term such as "Yahoo" can.

2007-07-28 23:25:04 · answer #5 · answered by t_dildine2000 3 · 0 0

not at all, looks like you're not getting the meaning of "google"

2007-07-28 23:27:55 · answer #6 · answered by LaGellies 2 · 0 0

Doesn't bother me a bit. How about the common use of "Kleenex", "coke", or "cutex"?

2007-07-28 23:34:49 · answer #7 · answered by Wildflower 3 · 0 0

No. I get annoyed at people who get annoyed at little things.

It's.....well, it just evokes vexation (go Google it).

2007-07-28 23:39:41 · answer #8 · answered by TameBeast 6 · 0 0

yes, now get back to picking the cotton sharifjunaid before i wip u.

2007-07-28 23:29:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well it is the most famous (and best IMO)

2007-07-28 23:22:53 · answer #10 · answered by J Stilla Da Mic Killa 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers