Ever heard of being between a rock and a hard place?
If they don't stop the war, neocons blame them for letting it continue. If they do, the same neocons cry they aren't supporting our troops when Bush leaves them there a little while rather than immediate withdrawl.
Don't know about you, but I'd much rather be blamed for not stopping Bush's war than blamed for not supporting the troops while they are in dangerous lands.
2007-07-28 14:30:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I see so you would have our very young boys over there fighting with old and broken equipment. You better think before you open your mouth and say something like that.What if your son or daughter was over there would you still feel the same way, no i think not.I am not for the war but i am for our guys getting the best equipment they can. It's funny how the republicans are blaming the democrats for not ending this war when the president who by the why order this war ,the last time i looked he was a republican was he not.
2007-07-28 21:29:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Teenie 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
This war is saving lives, buddy!!
We're over there protecting not only ourselves but the Iraqi people, who have'nt seen Freedom in a long, long time!
At the same token, Democrats want it to stop the war to cheer the enemy on, Al Qaeda, who if left unchecked would be on your door-step tomorrow, Ever think of it that way?
So, Which is better or worse-
An attack in America destroying our great life?
Or,
Us going going there, and saving people on both ends of the stick?
Which is it gonna be?
2007-07-28 21:34:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yeah those damn Democrats and that war they started, George W. Bush, our beloved President, tried everything he could to talk them out of it, but they would not budge, he said,"we should let cooler heads prevail", you should never go to war on a whim, it should only be a last resort, but those damn Democrats marched us off to Iraq and now look at the mess were in!
2007-07-28 21:30:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because the damn Republicans are obstructionists. Sure, a fair number of them are sticking their necks out to tell Bush they don't approve of his war policies, but they don't have the stones to walk the walk as well as talk the talk and vote with the Democrats to do something about it. Apparently, to them the party line is more important than backing up their big mouths with real action. This makes them cowards at the very least.
2007-07-28 21:40:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Because they realize that surrendering now would have horrific consequences, not the least of whichwould be the blood of genocide on their hands.
The Dems are dirty rotten liars who are pandering to the stupid, foolish, non thinking simpletons who comprise their base in order to gain votes. The joke is on the Democratic voters who are too dumb to see they are being played like a violin.
2007-07-28 21:25:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
All the democrats have to do is not fund the war.
This is what they said they would do, so why haven't they done this????
I know why they have NO BALLS.
And they know it is political death to do it.
So when they were running to win both houses they LIED like they always do.
That is the typical lib way lie or move to the right to get elected then do what ever you want.
Way to go LIBS. You bunch of liar's
2007-07-28 21:38:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
The repugs are the ones who keep blocking the Dems from doing anything so their rich croney buddies can make money!!! All the politics get in the way of doing what's right!!!
2007-07-28 21:24:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Catcanscratch 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
They're not dying needlessly. They signed on knowing full well war was a possibility.
2007-07-28 21:23:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Glen B 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Our beloved President Bush still has enough loyalists in the congress to stop the domestic traitors!
2007-07-28 21:24:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋