2007-07-28 11:06:17 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That we're freak'n desperate. Maybe even beyond that. But heaven forbid, don't vote for MORE government control Vote for someone that you know has a chance of winning that is willing to downsize this monstrosity and help us get back on track. NO, a Democrat is not the answer. :)
2007-07-28 11:43:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton, palms down. Why? She's the suitable candidate by potential of far. Giuliani is a multitude and after the journey of the final 6+ years there's no longer a Republican alive who would desire to speak me into vote casting for them. no longer till the real Republicans arise and take decrease back the social gathering from the neocons.
2016-10-09 12:17:06 · answer #2 · answered by yearby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I second this statement: "Anyone is better than Bush!"
When you have to, go with the lesser of two evils... In this case, I believe it would be Hillary. Rudy still thinks 9/11 had something to do with Iraq.
What does Rudy want to do, anyways? To me he seems like another yes-man / puppet for the Neo-Cons. I know Hillary would make ANOTHER try for Universal Healthcare, but that would probably fail... at least that's something. I doubt she has any reason to get us into anymore wars in the M.E., either.
2007-07-28 11:18:37 · answer #3 · answered by Sangria 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's even more simple than just the people.
We have the party of cheap labor and the party of cheap votes. Some choice on election day, huh?
We sorely need a good third party in this country.
2007-07-28 11:10:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is the thug. Let's see, she stole over 900 FBI files, cheated old people out of their lifes savings with her Whiterwater scam, laundered the money through a law partner's S&L. lied about the White House Travel Office so she could can them and give the job to her cronies, lied to a grand jury, hid her law firms fraudulent billing records until the statute of limitations ran out, stole incriminating evidence against her from Vince Foster's safe before his corpse was cold.
Shall I go on? There's a lot more. This woman ought to be under the jail...
2007-07-28 11:16:59 · answer #5 · answered by Dee B 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
We should ask Vince Foster and many others in Little Rock, who have had accidents and met their maker.
Ask Vince who is the Thug.
("Dee B" has a great answer.)
Very Intelligent, and Factual.
2007-07-28 11:20:53 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That popularity and money are all you need to get elected? So maybe we'll have Hilton and Lohan in a few years? Sad state of affairs in the US these days.
2007-07-28 11:17:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The primaries are over already?
DANG!
I thought they were NEXT year.
In other words, we do not yet know who the major parties will nominate.
But, as for those two -- I dunno why you call Hilary a transformer, but you're right; neither exactly rings my chimes (politically).
There are more parties than the big two.
2007-07-28 12:30:32 · answer #8 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thompson '08
2007-07-28 11:09:51 · answer #9 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Better than LIAR Bush anyday of the week!
2007-07-28 11:09:16 · answer #10 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋