well a man's brain is in there Ballz and it doesnt make them smarter.....lol
2007-07-28 10:07:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well. Considering the number of times the average woman has been clocked in the boob over the course of her life, we'd all be dead of brain damage.
You're obviously not up on human anatomy, so let me enlighten you: A woman's breasts are designed to produce milk to feed an infant. For this purpose, they are soft (so as not to give the poor child a head injury--see below) and located conveniently on the torso, where a child can be held to them for feeding.
A human being's brain, on the other hand, is designed to run the nervous system and do the thinking. For this purpose it is located within the protective shell of the skull, where it's less likely to become damaged if the body takes a bit of a beating. However, the skull's integrity can become compromised, or sufficiently severe head trauma can cause brain damage which can impede any or all of the brain's functions, from motor skills to intelligence. I fear the latter may explain your asking this question.
And Vi®us, check your facts--a recent study proved that in mixed company, men talk twice as much as women. You also use more cell phone minutes.
2007-07-28 22:39:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by slythwolf 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
And if the brain that is between men's shoulders were bigger than the brain between their legs, the world would be in a much better shape. This makes sense in an evolutionary context, right? God Bless.
2007-08-01 07:45:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bethy4 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it doesent because nature gave women breasts to nourish new born of our race.
The mothers milk has and never will have another substitute.
By the way a brain too large in size and needs a solid shell to protect it.
In a humourous way from a mans point of view a womans breasts have the most devaststing attraction and the way we feel them women would have brain haemorrages so logically it would not make sense to have them there.
2007-07-28 17:12:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
why not... then they might think like normal people.... think about it our brains our like computers.... computers run better the cooler you can keep them... everyone knows that men think with our penises.... hot air rises... women cant stop talking for it is the only way to vent all that hot air so their brain can keep them alive... men dont have this problem we think whith what is between our legs.... if none of this is true then why have men controlled so much power through out history... because we can think clearly... our thinking apparatus is not in danger of overheating all the time... we can take time to be quiet and think and not gab for days on end just to stop our brain having a meltdown
2007-07-28 17:24:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
-Since you asked, no, the question makes no sense, in any context.
-Women would not be smarter if their brains were in *their* breasts, anymore than if men's brains were in *their* breasts.
waswisgirl1: Using grammar check since it was first invented.
2007-07-28 18:12:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by edith clarke 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Would that mean that women like Pamela Anderson had her brains surgically implanted? And that small chested women were stupid?
I know you're joking, but it wouldn't help if our brains were in our boobs!
2007-07-28 23:01:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rainbow 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grow Up
2007-07-28 17:36:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by tea cup 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No after men played with them they would be droooling idiots in a week. Plus it hasnt helped men keeping their brain in their pants We both cant be drooling idiots
2007-07-28 18:20:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by bgddyhu 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but it would make sense if our eyes were located closer to them so that when men like you talk to us you could at least pretend to look us in the eyes...
2007-07-28 17:11:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by JQ 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
No ... but people asking questions like yours would seem smarter if they got their heads out of their a**!
2007-07-28 17:12:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋