English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Amercians have already voted in an actor, Ronald Reagan. Another actor, Fred Thompson, seems to be a serious contender for the Republican presidential nomination. Why draw the line there? Why not go all the way and vote for a porn actor or actress? He or she would be as qualified as any regular Hollywood actor. Discuss.

2007-07-28 09:36:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

ME: Using the word "Bush" in a question like this is an invitation for all sorts of tacky puns!

2007-07-28 09:49:16 · update #1

JOHN J: In some ways, a porn star would be a step up from the incumbent, wouldn't it?

2007-07-28 09:50:09 · update #2

USUCK79: Conservatives and Republicans have their own porn channel. It's called "FOX News"!

2007-07-28 09:51:02 · update #3

MARK H: With a porn star president, the phrase "Oval Office" would take on a whole new meaning!

2007-07-28 09:53:33 · update #4

DEVILS_ADVOCATEXXX: Polls on the President's "performance" would take on a whole new meaning!

2007-07-28 09:58:20 · update #5

TOMJOHN: You're being sexist! What if it was a male!

In one sense, I have to agree with you though. It's better to vote for someone with really big boobs than to vote for a really big boob.

2007-07-28 10:25:40 · update #6

Here's another thought: hasn't Dubya been giving the American public a "facial" repeatedly since he took power?

2007-07-28 10:51:45 · update #7

Does Bush wipe his "cheyney" on the Constitution after he's done?

2007-07-28 13:44:50 · update #8

25 answers

Well, they've already voted for a coke sniffing, alcoholic, draft dodger...what's so bad about a porn star?...

2007-07-28 09:40:08 · answer #1 · answered by John J 3 · 5 0

I think the best problem with voting in a porn star is most republicans are trying to keep the Clintons out of office. With a porn star as president. Bill would be making regular visits to the oval office.

2007-07-28 16:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by Sammy 4 · 2 0

If it came down to choosing between either a porn star or one of the current Republicans running for that office, I'd go with the porn star every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

2007-07-28 16:53:36 · answer #3 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 1 0

You are mistaken, they voted for "the great communicator Ronald Reagan" not the actor. They also voted on his experience and record as the Governor of CA. Fred Thompson holds some of the values that Reagan did, but comparing the two is not fair to either on of them. Tying either one of these fine Americans to a porn star status is just sick. Now if you want to talk porno...Willie and Monica would make a much better topic!

2007-07-28 16:47:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Reagan was one of the best Presidents for America; he was no "regular Hollywood actor". Don't go insulting.

I would not vote for one, no. The other Americans out there though, I cannot say. If the media said he/she would be a good candidate, they probably would have a chance.

2007-07-28 16:46:55 · answer #5 · answered by PrettySeaShell 4 · 1 1

Hollywood actors do tend to be dim wits but obviously Reagan and Thompson are not "regular" actors.

2007-07-28 16:42:35 · answer #6 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 1 0

Yes. Before he was elected President, Franklin Pierce was a porn star.

2007-07-28 16:42:32 · answer #7 · answered by elcomputo 1 · 1 0

I would vote for a porn star any day if my only other choice was a Republican

2007-07-28 17:12:13 · answer #8 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1 0

It could be no worse than the obscenity we already put up with. I'd call him one, and it's the VP's first name, but frankly I don't think that either has one between them, or the Congress the equipment that goes with it.


http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070730/case_to_impeach_the_president


They use guns and shoot people to make up for the lack. And leaf through all the neat photos they got from Abu Gharib.
!!!! ; ^ P

2007-07-28 17:33:59 · answer #9 · answered by Fr. Al 6 · 1 0

If the major news networks insisted a bowl of jell-o would be a good president....the slack jawed morons in this country would vote for it.

2007-07-28 16:41:03 · answer #10 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers