English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i believe it was because it seem to me it was done to make the american people support going in to war with iraq and soon iran

plus there are too much evidence that it was a demolition and tat bombs were planted through out the building

2007-07-28 09:22:26 · 11 answers · asked by animalhouser07 2 in Politics & Government Elections

want truck load of info if you want to critisize me hre:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xRd-iA8v89I

2007-07-28 09:46:34 · update #1

11 answers

I'm not saying I believe it, but here are some facts

-Each Tower was specifically designed to handle MULTIPLE BOEING COLLISIONS
-The passport of one of the hijackers conveniently landed on top of the rubble, unharmed (people were VAPORIZED by fire, but a collection of paper wasn't)
-if the floors collapsed there would be sheets stacked up
-if you watched the news at the time, all the reporters talked about secondary explosions and said this must have been a demolition by the terrorists
-Apparently, Flight 93 completely vaporized on impact, which is an anomoly never seen before
-There was almost no plane wreckage in the Pentagon, and certainly not enough for it to be a Boeing
-the man who supposedly flew the plane into the Pentagon was known by his teachers to not even be capable of flying a small plane, especially on the obstacle course that he would have to maneuver past to get the Pentagon
-http://chainsawsanders.com/howtocutasteelbeam.jpg This image is pointing at the wrong things, its looking for mellted steel, but the real thing to notice is the diagonally cut beams, a classic step in demolition
-No defense whatsoever. Jets usually take 10 minutes to respond, they were notified 80 minutes ahead of time that flight 93 was headed to its target
-People on the bottom floors were lifted up by something that made a BOOM sound, several seconds later, the plane hit
-Again, how does a plane of steel vaporize but leave bodies intact
-FBI is not releasing 80+ videos of the pentagon strike
-again, if the floors only weakened from the columns, you would have columns standing up
-The Towers fell at essentially freefall
-Molten steel found 4 weeks after the events, this burning debris isn't covered in the report
-traces of Thermate (thermite compound) were found, it could be unrelated
-the 9/11 comission says finding the man who paid for the incident is of insignificane
-GW and Cheney would only appear in front of the 9/11 commsion under their conditions: not under oath, they would be together (so they say the same story?), no recording allowed, no transcript allowed, no press or victim families allowed

You can look up the warnings we had before 9/11 as well, which I didn't cover, or you can blind yourself from them. I also forgot a lot of things. And then I can make a list much longer for WTC7, like how it cracked in the center, something that happens in demolitions, not fires.

2007-07-28 10:04:04 · answer #1 · answered by Ben Has Questions 2 · 3 1

in case you have studied Islam then you certainly could be conscious that Islam does not condone or help acts or terrorism from now on than Christianity supported the an prolonged time of I.R.A. terrorist bombings and the likes of radical fundamentalists consisting of Timothy McVay . to tug a surah (incomplete as that's) out of the Quran and carry it severe as a banner of indictment against the completed concept device supplies little credence to the factor you're attempting to make. Christianity ,Islam,Judaism,all significant stream religions all have had their proportion of radical fundamentalists, who do no longer characterize the actual concept device yet a politically stimulated motive, and such is the case with bin weighted down and 9/11. I completely accept as true with you that bin weighted down ,who keep in mind became into initially a operative knowledgeable with the aid of the U.S. government is a fantic and an extremist. it is likewise very exciting to be conscious the close connections between the bin weighted down kin and the Bush kin in terms of company institutions even on the actual day of the 9/11 bombings and afterwards . Many Muslims died on 9/11 as properly as Christians,Jews alongside with representatives of surprisingly much each non secular concept. That barbarous act of terrorism had no longer something to do with Islam as a concept device and so lots greater to do with skill and politics.

2016-10-19 07:39:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There is a lot out there .From where was NORAD to why did the commander of NORAD on 9/11 get a promotion to where did the gold go to how building 7 came down when the owner says he "pulled" it just before it apparently fell

In no way has Bush or the US government been transparent in it's answers -

There is a lot of questions -

Why was the evidence of multiple sites desroyed that day ?


How is it possible that the building fell at the same speed of free fall ? Why was it the first and only building of it's kind to fall The Empire State building was hit by a large plane - still standing

Why is it that 10 of the 19 hyjackers are alive and well in Pakistan

How did a passport survive out of the ruble of a fire hot enough to "melt" steel ?

80 minutes for NORAD to scramble 1 jet ?

Melted steel - but a passport found

Building falls at free fall with no resistance from other floors but - it collapsed on it's own wieght floor by floor (the pancake theory) leaving not one standing central steel rods - They melted ????? Did it melt or collapse and how is it possible for that to happen all at once ?


The FBI refuses to release tapes of the plane hitting the Pentagon - You would think they would want to show all of America these tapes - even if they had to edit someone's face out of it - But they won't because there is somthing to hide

Doesn't matter though

2007-07-28 09:35:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Seek psychiatric advice. Someone deliberately murdered 3,000 people in America as an excuse? Planted explosives in exactly the right place where aircraft would be flown into the building?

Never seen one of those demolition documentariues? It would have taken weeks of work with jackhammers and many tons of explosive just to set it up. Then there would have been the miles of fusewire - all in plain sight. And no one noticed?

Come on. You have lost all contact with reality.

2007-07-28 09:30:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Mark, why would one of the conspirators admit their part in it if it were an inside job ?

Remember, Richard Nixon thought he'd never be caught, too.


;-(

2007-07-28 11:49:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Sounds like you people believe in the magic bullet theory to.

2007-07-28 10:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by Teenie 7 · 1 1

Yes.

Sandy Berger stole & destroyed classified documents to protect Bill Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.

So Clinton was involved, somehow.

2007-07-28 09:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by wolf 6 · 1 5

OK, once again.

Give me just one name of just one co-conspirator in this who has admitted that he had something to do with it.

Just one.

Waiting....

Give up?

Because, they're aren't any.

2007-07-28 10:44:24 · answer #8 · answered by Mark A 6 · 0 0

No i personally dont think so

2007-07-28 10:32:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

try thishttp://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html

2007-07-28 12:00:30 · answer #10 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers