Well, honey, because they aren't the same thing.
2007-07-28 09:23:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by LoneStar 4
·
10⤊
2⤋
There's a big difference between killing defenseless babies in the womb and killing the babies and young children of the enemy, the terrorists, who use their own children as suicide bombers and intentionally place their own children in harm's way, in hopes that the "Great Satan" USA is so weak and sentimental that we won't use deadly force to defeat them if we have to harm their babies and young children to do it! Have you not heard about the indoctrination of their children to hate America? Do you believe that the American troops have killed as many babies in Iraq and Afghanistan as have been killed in the American "Holocaust" known as abortion?
BTW, would you rather bow down to Al-lah, the moon god, or get beheaded if you refused, or have our volunteer military get their mission done over there?
I don't understand how your reference to FOX news being, "all over Kerry during the running," relates to this question - could you please clarify what you mean in your last sentence?
Hey, "Renaissance Man": If you believe that abortion is not murder or does not kill babies, you either need to brush up on basic biology, believe the lies of the pro-abortionists or you are self-deluded!
2007-07-30 03:15:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by trebor namyl hcaeb 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
To tell you the honest truth. It is the 'terrorist' who are murdering the babies. Not the President of the US. Nor the US military.
If we left Iraq. The terrorist would take over & do a genocide for their evil agenda to control with fear. In Africa, genocide happens because of evil agendas. Terrorist sunni & shiitte strongholds have tortured & murdered Christians in Iraq. Killing many innocent children of God. See? the talaban terrorist were removed, but now they kidnapped S. Korean Christians & murdered the Pastor who was full of love & joy in his picture. This is unconstitutional in Aphganistan now, since the new constitution guaranteeing you can't kill someone for their faith. This is unconstitutional in Iraq also.
Who are the ones who murder people for their faith? This is Gods decision and not mans. It is written to fear God & not man. For God is the one with the power to put a persons soul in hell. The reason religious self righteous think they can kill someone who doesn't believe like they do, is because they are angry. They are critical and judging others as guilty. Self righteous judging in their own perverted judgment. Hay, This is unconstitutional to kill someone for their faith. Shiites also kill Sunni or Sunni also kill Shiites. Because they are angry & do revenge killings.
Now the win of Iraqi Athletes & the Iraqi's rejoice. But the terrorist are angry that they would be happy. So they are angry & murder some innocent Iraqis.
President Bush isn't guilty of murdering babies in war. You are wrong.
The ones guilty of murdering babies are clearly terrorist Islamic Jihadist for self righteous purposes to gain control through fear. Terrorist are very sadistic & demon possessed people. They drool at the mouth when they murder. They have a lust for it.
Thanks Greg.
2007-07-30 12:46:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by LottaLou 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
To answer your first question, I refer you to a classic George Carlin routine when he states that pro-lifers are "not pro-life, they're anti-woman!" He suggests that in the minds of pro-lifers, it's okay to save a fetus, but if that fetus grows up to be a doctor, they'd have to kill it.
As for Fox Noise, if you didn't get the memo by now, they're the unofficial propaganda arm of the Republican Party. I recommend that you see "Outfoxed" sometime.
2007-07-28 20:20:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Their to busy trying to get their make up on and they have the same old 1,2,3 anytime you happen to accidental hit that channel without realizing it. They still think Gore and Bush is reading chads in Florida, they haven't even been told that we are fighting in Iraq not Florida. That is one channel that is so behind times look at old big headed O'Reilly, that slant eyed girl whatever she might be and just the whole caboodle is hard on the eyes. Just a bunch of loud mouth know it alls that don't know if it is Tuesday, Saturday whatever, just whatever.
2007-07-28 16:31:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nicki 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I have never understood why people try to make the connection between war and abortion. I'm pro war and pro life, because I can recognize the difference in the situations. There is a big difference between killing an armed adult who would kill you just as quickly if he had the chance, and killing a defenseless child.
2007-07-28 16:22:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dekardkain 3
·
9⤊
3⤋
Save the unborn so we can send them to war...?
Bush seems like an Old Testament type of guy. Don't understand his logic but greed is a big factor to his motivation.
2007-07-28 16:49:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
I actually think this is a good question. I'm going to star it. You are simply pointing the inconsistencies in Bush and the Bushies policies. And there are quite a few. But, you can't teach old dogs new tricks, like honesty, for example.
2007-07-28 16:46:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Not so looney afterall 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
Yes, but those are collateral babies. Whats a few thousand dead babies when you're sneaking 100,000 - 300,000 barrels of oil out of Iraq each day.
2007-07-28 16:34:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Apples and oranges. Their is a big difference in collateral damage from a war and a parent cold bloodily killing her own child.
2007-07-28 16:24:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by jim h 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
George Bush has no idea what he stands for. he is against abortion which panders to the religious right, yet people who die in the Iraq war are collateral damage and the army ( he is commander in chief") don't keep that number because it doesn't count. he is pro- defense of the United States, so much so that he invades Iraq for no real reason, yet he veto's bills that would tighten security across the southern borders. You ask for his logic, but G.W.B. hasn't met a constitution he hasn't defiled. I'm just glad he's your president.
2007-07-28 16:27:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by douglas m 3
·
3⤊
7⤋