i did and i DONT wanna hear a bunch whining . It would have been a refreshing change if the hero ACTUALLY lost or died for once
2007-07-28 08:13:53 · 15 answers · asked by roadrunner_13 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Wouldnt it be more realistic? I mean everyone knows that good doesnt always prevail and Voldemort has waaay more experience harrys 17!
2007-07-28 08:20:09 · update #1
Our heroic figure "Harry" might die in a French film, but as the book will no doubtably be made into a world released film, our hero could not die. It would be too much of a downer....
Sad but true, if Rowling had written Harry into death, then there would have been a lot less revenue for her from box office sales for year 7 and perhaps year 6 as it has not come out yet.
Money makes the world go around, the world go around......
QueryAll on the Internet
2007-07-28 08:20:33 · answer #1 · answered by QueryAll 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron marries Ginny, has six kids.
Hermoine and Luna move to Boston and live together.
Lupin eats Tonks.
Draco finds out he’s a Weasley and kills self.
Snape learns that Dumbledore is his Father, and Mother.
Sirius comes back to life, only to die from an overdose.
McGonagall eats Doby the house elf.
Neville Longbottom comes out of the closet.
Hagrid is arrest by aurors for child molestation.
Dumbledore becomes minister, then gets impeached, and kills self.
George and Fred get sent to Azkaban for making bertie bots every flavored heroine.
“He Who Must Not Be Named” Changes his name to Jack.
Duddly Dersly becomes gay, Dad follows.
Krum becomes a bum.
Percy Weasly is found to actually be straight.
And yes Harry Potter Dies!, from Oliver’s HIV infected Wood.
2007-07-31 22:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by Albus D. 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I was reading it, until I got to that part, I thought Harry was going to have to die. I most certainly did not want Harry to die, yet I would have understood if she chose to end the book that way. It would have made sense that he gave the ultimate sacrifice, his life, so that everyone else would be alright. I see where you're going with wanting Harry to die, but I'm glad she kept him alive and instead only showed his close brush with death.
2007-07-28 15:37:59 · answer #3 · answered by Cass M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wanted Harry to die, i'm not saying i didn't want Voldemort to die too but i wanted Harry to die and someone, Ron or Neville, to avenge him by killly Voldemort.
2007-07-28 15:32:37 · answer #4 · answered by KittyFly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I kinda wanted something a bit more dramatic than part of the books describing Harry going camping. But I guess it's been written like that so oh well. The ending of the 7th reminds me of the ending of Eragon though.
&hearts Alice
2007-07-28 15:21:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voldemort, mainly. :-P
There was so much sad and scary stuff in that book, I think it would have been too dark to be a kids' book if Harry had died after all that.
2007-07-28 15:17:24 · answer #6 · answered by Ambivalence 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didnt want him to die, but my aunt said weeks before it came out that she thougth Harry would die in the process of killing voldemort so that he and voldemort would be dead. I'm glad he didnt though
2007-07-28 15:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by horsecrazygal01 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would have liked him and Voldermort to die, because it would have recognised that the age group, who had grown up with the book (by that i mean people who were at the same age as Harry), have grown up aswell.
But then again, i thought it was a cracking book.... so im not complaining.
2007-07-28 15:17:41 · answer #8 · answered by Andy C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it would have been interesting if harry died cuz then the other characters would have to had to find a way to kill Voldemort.
2007-07-28 15:25:32 · answer #9 · answered by howardlee1977 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely! Voldemort dying was so predictable!
2007-07-28 15:16:05 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋