It's all part of the neocon/Bush cabal strategy:
If you can't BEAT YOUR ENEMY MILITARILY, you give them them the tools they need to start killing themselves off and target our forces at the same time.
Through a proxy server.
This way, the war goes on and on, and on, and Bush and his cronies can lord this over us for another 1.5 years--as "winning the war on terror" and "winning the war in Iraq".
2007-07-28 09:56:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No surprise. The Bush family have been holding hands with these people for years. Well before 9/11. It seems that the justification this time is that the arms are needed to protect the current "friendly" regime from being toppled by the extremists.
2007-07-28 07:49:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That and arming the Sunnis. It doesnt make much sense to me. What you have to realize is that the Air Force had told the F-22 makers they would buy 500+ aircraft. Well they changed their minds to like 175 of them. Thats a huge loss. They are trying to sell to Japan and anyone that can afford them.
2007-07-28 11:33:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
come on, Saudi is buying, it happens that US is one of the bidder's that won, in the last Gulf War in early 90's Saudi paid Billions of Dollar for all the arms and services(Help) made by US..
Saudi just bought several new Planes from UK.. they have the money, they need to protect their land, Oils...etc..
2007-07-28 07:52:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by R.A. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We sell to the Saudis, they give the weapons to terrorists sneaking into Iraq, we kill the terrorists and get the weapons back, and sell them all over again.
2007-07-28 08:02:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
at least Saudi paying top $$$ for their deal and if US refuse the deal they can get it some where els. But Israel making the whole US tax payers pay billions $$$ for their deals.
2007-07-29 07:48:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nabil 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
f*ck me! I knew that man was dangerous but that takes the biscuit! Nothin u can do, afterall its not like he was even elected in the first place is it?
2007-07-28 07:58:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋