When will the people understand our government has been bought and paid for by corporate globalists?
This includes members from the Republican and Democrat parties!
Since every day more and more people are realizing the seriouness of this situation and basically the 'cat's out of the bag' so to speak, why isn't the media asking these questions?
GHW Bush created NAFTA and Bill Clinton made it law. Now GW Bush is responsible for taking this further with SPP and CAFTA and other programs making way for the NAU.
Why would a Democrat President be working in conjunction with Republican Presidents in this matter?
2007-07-28
05:19:03
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
It seems that the only politicians willing to question these policies are third tier candidates like Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel!
The candidates that actually oppose this NAU and have the smallest voice in it!
2007-07-28
05:21:13 ·
update #1
Search 'Bilderberg'. This years meeting was in Istanbul and was held at the end of May thru early June!
Why not just ask them about this?
2007-07-28
05:22:55 ·
update #2
You hate those globalists, don't you.
They are just so very successful and powerful.
They exercise their right to assemble with each other...and engage in commerce...and petition their government for redress.
Thing is, Kelly, *YOU* are just not very good at doing the things mentioned above.
And rather than look in the mirror and improve yourself and become more productive, you complain about people who assemble, and engage in commerce, and engage their government...and you call them evil.
No, Kelly, it is your idea that is evil.
Turn off your computer with the Chinese made parts, and improve your job skills...then you can join the rest of us who realize that wealth is not shared...it is *created.*
2007-07-29 05:20:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You asked a very good question that many Americans just don't want to know the answer to. The masses have been duped for decades to the point where the once unthinkable is now policy. Everyone wants a government that is ethical, responsible, and respectful of the constitution. Elected officials are supposed to reflect their constituents. In some ways many are, as those that elected them are also complacent and only desire instant gratification for themselves. If Americans just stopped watching network television until the media demanded answers to real issues their ad revenue would force their allegiance back to the public where it once was. One can google the member / attendee lists for Bilderberg, PNAC, Bohemian Grove, and several others and see how all the right personnel to pull off a 9/11 type event are networked together secretly. I think the issues we are facing today will pale in comparison to what we will be forced to endure soon if any of the top seeded candidates from either party become elected. And, lastly now that I will again be labled a liberal or conspiracy theorist I will at least know that there are others here trying to open the eyes and minds of the massive flock of sheep in America formerly known as free people.
2007-07-28 13:30:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by John S 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree Kelly. But who are you voting for? We need to have alternatives to the two corrupt wings of the single party and I don't see much happening in that area. And, what action there is, neither party or the media will let the 3rd parties participate.
On the up side of you question. Maybe all this globalization will help workers of the world unite and demand their rights. There is a movement started but it is in it's infancy right now but gaining momentum. You can only push the workers around so much until they start wising up and organizing themselves against the oppressive system. If you look at what is going on in Oaxaca Mexico, Nigeria, uprisings in a lot of other countries in the world including our own with the undocumented workers where the people are being gravely taken advantaged of by these corporate globalists, they are rising up. It's only a matter of time.
Workers of the world UNITE!
BTW, I'm voting for Kucinich.
2007-07-28 12:22:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You'll need to explain the consequences or evils of globalization, from the workers perspective. I don't see it. Do you think wages are meant to make us rich? They are not. We make just enough to keep coming back. If wages rise, so does the cost of living. Just as long as we have work here to do then we'll be fine. My only concern would be in who controls the food supply. That is a necessity.
Even with jobs leaving the country we still have very low unemployment. It's been low for a long time. The jobs that left cover the range of pay for average workers. Even at that, unemployment will rise and fall based on on feds rate policy. So what. What I do see is our recent congressional policy causing some problems in employment. They need to keep their hands out. The large corporations can do what they want as far as I'm concerned. Earlier this week I heard they pay about a 40% tax rate, according to Paulson. That keeps more money in our pockets. And most of our jobs come from small businesses. Those are the ones I'd worry about.
2007-07-28 12:52:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by JohnFromNC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The media is paid for by the Trilateral Commission and Bildeberg Group, so they would never question the candidates that are affiliated with these groups about their globalist affiliation. What concerns me more is that the Trilateral Commission, CFR, and Bildeberg Group were all founded by David Rockefeller, who controls most of the major oil reserves and companies in the world and who is an admitted globalist.
I am also extremely concerned about this. Most of the candidates besides Gravel, Paul, and Kucinich are affiliated with either the CFR, Trilateral Commission, or the Bildeberg Group.
2007-07-28 12:22:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kelly B.....
The problem is that many of our media outlets are being bought out by bigger media conglomerates, sort of the same thing that happened to mom-and-pop stores...
The only thing that we as people can rely on is websites like Yahoo Q & A, Internet sites, small independent newspapers and radio stations...The major media outlets are being controlled by the people and groups that you mentioned...The reason that both parties are "working in conjunction" with each other is because they all belong to the same group and clubs...Plus, the way to get elected in this country is with alot of cash...Some good people like yourself, Ms. Kelly B, won't run for office because of "smear campaining"....People don't want their names and reputations and families to be dragged thru the mud...
In conclusion, people like you ARE making a difference.
You just have to realize that everyone will not see "the truth"...You only need a few to make a difference. In science, we are taught that it does not take much energy to set off a chain reaction....So just keep doing a wonderful job, but enjoy the Journey...One day, you'll be telling your Grand-kids how you made history and changes in the World for the betterment of ALL MANKIND.....
2007-07-28 12:52:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Biotech Boy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
where does all of the millions go that are campaign funds??
the media..that's who..
funny I cannot discern who is global and who is nationalistic enough to determine where to fall..but we seem to have paid a huge price..
I got on that site Prisonplanet..the pictures are cropped fabrications..I think trade agreements and nationalism are two different things
2007-07-28 12:36:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vote Ron Paul then.
2007-07-28 12:24:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Greg 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is wrong with globalization? I do not have a problem with it because my family seems to be doing well. Globalization is a good thing for those who want a better society and willing to adapt to societal change.
2007-07-28 12:22:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Stylish One 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because it's good economics.
2007-07-28 12:21:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by $Sun King$ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋