but not conseratives to respond to attacks on our own soil??
2007-07-28 04:25:26 · 16 answers · asked by tom the plumber 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
good question..
2007-07-28 04:39:18 · answer #1 · answered by Greg 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the Democrats jumped off a bridge?...
Seriously, Vietnam was not OK. Invading Iraq was the wrong response to 911. Iraq did not attack us. Most of the perpetrators of 911 were from Saudi Arabia and they are still our allies. Bush gave up on th search for Osama bin Laden to start a war that was irrelevant to our being attacked. If you disagree with using nuclear weapons to end WWII, I'd like to see you come up with a better solution.
2007-07-28 13:33:31 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you make such sweeping general statements? War is a very serious matter, for which there can be no general "it's right" or "it's wrong" rule. War is a SITUATIONAL evil, not a conceptual one. Therefore, each war must be judged on its own merits - its causes, what led up to the start of it, etc.
And the war in Iraq is NOT a response to 9/11. Even George W. Bush admits that; why can't the rest of you accept it?
2007-07-28 11:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Eisenhower, Nixon, Regan and now Bush and Cheney have destroyed US more than any democrat till date. Check whatever site you want to and you will be amazed to see that there's no one as worse as Bush & Cheney.
And one more thing, there's still tremendous suspicion of 9/11 being an inside job. So you decide who starts wars and destroys not only other countries but US as well from the inside
2007-07-28 12:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by The ROCK 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's cool to start wars and use nukes... especially, when the administration cannot get its stories straight. Democrates are equally culpable.
If you are refering to 9/11/2001 attacks, may I suggest that you do a little research into errors in the 9/11 Commisson report?
By the way, what ever happened to those WMDs?
One final question: Are you really safer today because of our attacks and occupations of countries in the Middle East?
2007-07-28 11:35:12 · answer #5 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good question,
Most people forget that democrats were the "Hawks" of the early 40s and 50s.
But then again, FDR and Truman were far greater men who still held personal responsibility and integrity as a traits to be admired. Unlike any democrat in the last 40 years.
2007-07-28 11:33:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
It isn't okay anyone to start wars and invading Iraq was a reckless response to 9/11.
2007-07-28 11:29:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Specifics?
2007-07-28 11:29:19 · answer #8 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is not OK on either side of the aisle.
2007-07-28 11:29:14 · answer #9 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It isn't OK for anyone to use nucleur weapons.
Although the Bush thugs seem to think it is OK for them
2007-07-28 11:30:42 · answer #10 · answered by R8derMike 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
because you did not attack the people that attacked us...you went after someone else
2007-07-28 11:34:23 · answer #11 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋