This isn't a racial comment. I have a question about consistency.
Don Imus is white, his victims were black.
Vick is black, his victims were not white. They are dogs. Dogs who would lick Vick's hand before dying from a fight he caused them to suffer.
They are animals which most people view as friends to all. Trusting without condition and dependent on the kindness of people.
In the case of Don Imus, it was just as likely that his victims would commit the same offense. Not so with the dogs.
If the crusade with Sharpton is real, shouldn't he be equally and publiclly demanding of Vick for his offense?
2007-07-28 03:03:05 · 5 answers · asked by Lorenzo H 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes [he should], that is, if he doesn't have any other pressing "worthwhile" crusades that require his meddling and stirring-up-the-pot, like someone freely speaking their mind.
2007-07-28 03:16:46 · answer #1 · answered by soulguy85 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just hope mike vick has to spend every cent he has on defending this case , then gets a long penitentiary term afterwards ............ then burns in hell .
The only real winner in this case would be al sharpton , who`d be laughing ................... all the way to the bank !
2007-07-28 10:19:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Believe me, AL SHARLATAN will stay as far away from VICK as possible
2007-07-28 10:22:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he has never met a camera he didn't like.so,i suspect that when he figures out a way you'll hear from him.
2007-07-28 14:08:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
only if the dogs are black.
2007-07-28 23:02:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋