So why is militarized economic globalization wrong?

Question

If you think Iraq is anything other than m.e.g. you'd be very wrong!

Jen: As do I 100%!
I ask questions this way in hopes that people on the right will try to explain this ideology to me!
It seems that it's OK to some as long as the U.S. stays on top and isn't the one being subjugated!

Answer 1

Turn off your computer, Miss Kelly...those evil globalists produced it.

Answer 2

Militarized economic globalization consists of what? Alot of words.What is m.E.g. You need to be specific in your question. Iraq needs persons who can assist in a financial and theoretic manner. Persons need to understand that Iraq is crippled economically and needs businesses and homes and a promise of a new era. Everyone wants to cry FEAR and of course the suicide bombers keep out every contractor that trys to assist in creating a new Iraq. An Iraq that can be self sufficient in the business world. Rebok, is a prime candidate to assist in this global chaos. Lets start creating some kind of financial structure. MacDonalds could help feed some of Iraq but I feel that a good tiejen or a stew supply kind of a facility; would do better since Arabs don't eat junk food.

Answer 3

Because the criminal mafiosa that has instigated the globalization of the world economy (better known as the Illuminati / the New Worrld Order) doesn't and won't stop at Iraq. The intent is GLOBAL!! Hence, every country in the world will be subjugated by a global police state not dissimmilar to the Nazi SS. All but 500,000 people will be exterminated. Unless you'd like to be one of those exterminated, I suggest you begin speaking out, very LOUDLY, against the New World Order.

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

Answer 4

Economically, Iraq is improving somewhat - there is an exchange now and there are actual investors in parts of the country. Power plants cannot keep up with energy demand because they never had to power air-conditioners before! The future for the Iraqi would be even brighter w/o the insurgency!

I'm not justifying the war, just looking @ the bright side of so-called m.e.g. The "good" Iraqis couldn't do it alone!

Answer 5

Now tell me, isn't a free market about the consumer rewarding the company that produces good products/services with their custom? That the more efficient a company is the lower its prices can be, so more people shop there? Tell me; if you say to a country "You will have starbucks. You will like it. If you don't, we will punish you." and Starbucks come in with godawful coffee, who treat their workers terribly, and they buy up all the family run coffee houses that the populace LIKE to drink at, is this a free market?

Militarized globalism is completely against the principles of the free market - and I thought the free market was almost THE most sacred American institution.

Answer 6

There are 3 types of countries... The Western ones and the 3rd world ones (along with major oil producers). Basically the richer countries have incentive to keep the 3rd world countries poor (poor country=cheap labor and cheap goods) EDIT The incentive in keeping people poor is they can pay $1 a day to a person to work in a factory there as opposed to $8 an hour here. If the country as a whole gets richer, then people will want to be paid more money and the prices of everything goes up. In trade, Ill use Thailand as an example. Thailand is poor, meaning alot of developed industries that we have here are nonexistant. For the Thai to get these they have to trade with a developed country to get these types of goods. If Thailand got richer, they would not need to pay for goods like this and hurt the developed countries EDIT 2 I am going to use OWS as an example. People in a country see a good fraction making alot of money, so they want more money. When a country begins to get richer, people want wore money. Yes they can make more money, but when you talk about going from paying $1 a day to $80 a day, you are losing alot more than you are making. You misunderstood my second point. I was saying that there are goods that are unique to developed, westernized countries. As a poor country gets more developed, they can produce these goods themselves and dont need to trade with us anymore

Answer 7

I don't know enough to judge the morality of it. But it is certainly Criminally Stupid.

That's a game the Chinese are going to win. They already hold enough US debt that in ten years more, if the deficits and trade imbalances keep piling up, they won't have to invade the US. They can just foreclose.

China's used US technology and the factories we built for them to upgrade the PLA so that the largest army in the world is now also the best equipped. Our own military won't be able to fight them because we buy practically everything the military uses from them. All they have to do is turn off the tap and the US Army is helpless for a minmum of 3 years.

Mao said, "The last Capitalist will sell us the rope to hang him." The "Free Traders" seem intent on proving him right.

Answer 8

So you are advocating that brutes with guns be given unprecedented authority and jurisdiction to do basically whatever they want, wherever they want in terms of "globalization". Who says they are going to like or allow YOU to keep doing what it is that you are doing? Would you still be for it then? And who exactly do you feel is educated and wise enough to rule the world? No one that I know of. Yes, I do believe that Iraq is an attempt at this, but I oppose it 100%.

Answer 9

Because it is bad for everyone, except for the Military/Industrial Complex! And the Military Industrial Complex is also bad for everyone except itself! Also, because Freedom and Love, is what we all really are as souls experiencing life in the physical plane, and militarized economic globalization is not about freedom and love, it is about control and domination! *sm*

Answer 10

Do we citizens want a unified, global military here in our land? NO! You might like to do a Google search on the 'New World Order'. and its horrible agenda to create a one world government........at the expense of losing our freedoms yet. Most of our politicians today are in on this, sad to say.

Answer 11

It was tried back in the 30's and 40' in Europe. It's called Nazism