Where are the Weapons of mass destruction?

Question

OK , now that you have fallen into my trap, why not see if you can pay attention.. The international communtity had all suggested reason to beleive that they exist...the Congress and the UN signed off on the war AND.....WE FOUND WMD's IN IRAQ!! Refuse to remember if you wish....But research WMD's around April of 2004 for yourself....I was here in Iraq while you idiots were watching it on TV. So shutup with your uneducated mantra, Let the CIC do his job, Let us do our jobs.

Answer 1

Thousands of weapons were found and destoyed AFTER we took the country.

We found precursers for chemical AND biological weapons.

We found rpecursers for Nuclear weapons INCLUDING the yellow cake Uranium the Mr' Wilson (of the whole Valerie Plame case) said did not exist.

We found chemical munitions for artilery shels and rockets.

For me, this is just one more piece of evidence as to how corrupt the main stream media have become as well as the ENTIRE DEMONcRAT party.

Answer 2

You are simply another ignorant/dangerous fool allowed by Yahoo to spread LIES on this site.

First thing stupid,is that all the international community DID NOT SUGGEST/BELIEVE that Iraq had WMDS including the nuclear UN Commission who in fact were fairly sure that Saddam did not have WMDs.

Your filthiest lie is that the UN "signed off" on Bush's crime against humanity in Iraq when in fact the UN refused to have anything to do with the US atrocity and declared the war ILLEGAL under international law.

This news flash has just been sent around the world from REUTERS:

"After years of not finding any Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq ,the US government is pleased/thrilled/relieved to announce that that have found a weapon of mass destruction sitting in a chair in the White House Oval Office.

Authorities further announced that they are sending in a team from Congress to neutralize the weapon."

Answer 3

The worst and most destructive WMD's are held by the superpowers and we are expected to trust that they have the common sense and restraint to keep them only as a last resort. Yeah right. A few chemical weapons and a bit of high explosive do not constitute WMD because they are only "weapons of a little bit of destruction before you get your **** kicked by somebody with some real weapons". My bet is that there are more "WMD" in the hands of U.S. civilians than there ever were in Iraq.

Answer 4

To answer your question, the WMDs are in North Dakota, and other select areas of the US, as well as on several of our aircraft carriers and submarines.

As for your other propaganda, I hate to break it to you, but 1) you weren't in Iraq in 2004 and you aren't there right now and 2) there were no WMDs found in Iraq in April 2004 or any other time for that matter.

Answer 5

The WMD's are in the White House...

Answer 6

i was also in the military before that and i know where the WMD is but it is on a need to know basis

Answer 7

They are in DC~

clinton
pelosi
kennedy
reid
boxer
kerry
Let's not forget the almighty ACLU~
That was easy to answer,Next?

Answer 8

If your trying to get people to believe in you and your story, you might try another approach. Maybe by being a little less rude!

Answer 9

i had a couple real good friends that were over there...there was wmd's everywhere...

Answer 10

i take it that u are american, well i'm american too....

so your question: was Where are the Weapons of mass destruction?

they are in america, russia, china, britain and all the other countries that own nuclear weapons.....................