English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was called the Salmon brothers building or world trade center building #7
The twin towers were building #1 and #2 and yes there were other buildings 3,4,5,6, no they did not all collapse. just burned under tons of ruble. They did not all fall down at free fall speed like WTC #7
Please look into this for Christ sakes, How can you call people wack jobs when you have no clue what they are talking about?
Stop watching so much TV, it rots your brain.

2007-07-27 22:43:09 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

4 answers

Yes I know and yes I believe building seven WAS controlled demolition.After research which BTW leads me to believe most conspiracy theories are rubbish(WTC1 and 2 were not controlled demolition in my informed opinion).I believe documentaries like loosechange are that factually wrong on so many points that they are actually part of the governments control,a way to channel the questions people have to a place where they hurt no more cos they loose all credibility.Nevertheless I still believe building seven WAS controlled demolition

2007-07-27 22:53:31 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2 2

Yes WTC7 was a controlled demolition. It exhibited all the classic signs for it. For WTC 1 & 2, many would say it was due to the fires. But look at the fact that all 3 towers that fell all had molten metal underneath them for 2-6wks afterwards. Only 2 were hit by planes. The fires weren't hot enough to even weaken the steel, and how would unsymetrical damage could cause a perfect symetrical collapse.

I believe what we saw was a top-down controlled demolition. Bigger question is how on the South Tower did the first 30 floors magically collapse on top of the damaged floors instead of the damaged floors collapsing on top of the remainder of the building. Along with the first 30 floors tipping off to the side so you'd expect that chunk of the building to cause damage outside of building's footprint. But when all was over, the entire building was reduced to dust. Guess fire is allowed to break all laws of physics now and then. Yeah, fire MY A##!!!!!!!!!

2007-07-28 21:15:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ted S 4 · 1 1

Matt-I lost three relatives in those towers. I want to know as much as I can about what happened. I've looked up everything I can find on the issue and then I ask myself -what will we do when we find out what the truth is and how will we know what's true or manufactured. I'm meeting this weekend with more family members and other members of Peaceful Tomorrows. I want to find out what they think about this whole thing.

2007-08-02 21:48:26 · answer #3 · answered by phlada64 6 · 1 0

What is your obsession with this? Is it because you were inside it at the time? This is like your 3rd question in a matter of minutes about this. What answer are you looking for? I'll be happy to tell you whatever you want to hear to make you stop already.

2007-07-28 05:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by jossa 3 · 0 6

fedest.com, questions and answers